BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Topic: Removal defense Clear Workflow: Immigration court deadline Clear

Results

Showing 205-216 of 233 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project Practice advisory No date

Practice Advisories

Support one of the most important human rights issues of our time.

Federal court Removal defense Evidence and procedure USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory No date

Practice Advisory and Appendices: Administrative Removal under 238(b): Questions and Answers

��t�SGNM�ri&��o�JMw�� ��ƣ��X�z�^"I+s���{wO��~n�mX�7k�P�(�gDY�� �P� m��'�z�t}MeLm��+��p�q[��T&=ѫ"����H�D��+拍�(� �>-����g�3b��F ��1��l�3NW���QfV1�� 3�l`F���f��� h&���,s�Yd 6����;f����a����#��]�q�!�n�>w����v�:�! 5 ��0G�4�l��FG���q!(!()xJ�������C�C�C�B-��Ò�F���]5��֘��y�_��P�:;� �(�R2�dP��Q���-�i����#�GZW�/��U�hY^��Wm�FJ��J�:�*W9ފ����� �I��|}�Y>'�!�(k�u�5˺ĺ�z������o�����v_�H��m^�|���+9W�>���zm��_e�EzX� ���_qE���z�ɊS�����W ��h$bE[�M� m���nU-��;Z�v� b���t1F��qb��P�

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory No date

Practice Advisory and Appendices: Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions : Supreme Court Limits Reach of Aggravated Felony “Sexual Abuse of a Minor” Ground and Provides Support on Other Crim-Imm Issues

%PDF-1.6 %���� 797 0 obj <> endobj 811 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[ ]/Index[797 46]/Info 796 0 R/Length 86/Prev 821975/Root 798 0 R/Size 843/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``^ "��d �d���@$�Z0� H2V�I�� �U$H\� �KD���E700120���e� ���߽����:] endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 842 0 obj <>stream h�b```��taf`f`�s,�s� �;�0g0l.��b�z N�o�'�֔�� 5+��<=8��+H�������A�A5��<���S ����T��i2l�J�/CO�A�� �sI $�D�4[.�9���8� [����Y� �&L�*`Bs����F����l& �r=�ą�� �L�

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory No date

Practice Advisory: Avoiding the Stop-Time Rule after Barton v. Barr

%PDF-1.7 %���� 651 0 obj <> endobj 670 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<8ABF87801E012047B4F1204A6BE303FB><89AE745D303EAD4799A22566D0785EE0>]/Index[651 44]/Info 650 0 R/Length 101/Prev 507696/Root 652 0 R/Size 695/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``����`��d����L�@$�w�H)���v�o�I��.�����4Al�� R� D�}��%���@"@�����?�@���QS endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 694 0 obj <>stream h�b```�j�!��1������^� ���L[�3(/�d�s8������i�i ��A o400L��Q��!����������6�7��݁�O)N�

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory No date

Practice Advisory: Getting Clients with ICE Detainers out of DOC Custody

K�u}��'v����������Yp��5�Xwl�:���E�%����FK-�qt������Ch2��"�N�i*~��/R �gp�E� ��ׂt�8d�⽚}�@v Q�� #� hI$�6�D��Gi��i�_�3�˸H�����6���-��@���.�{�B� �;�jgF �`L�����E����� �@b�iXbݦR����Bq�M?�K^ 7<]�A���� �� �"fT����J���N�k$V�k��Jd�f�9ޝ�5o�+��g��V,(o�p�S�0VG��+�=��3vgÁL4:͎�2(8��_a��@�T1#��t�+f�͢��81�FV�zw8�xf?�w�qr �R�T/u��@8����QCn�L3Ht�6� Cx8~��q� � �veM]�q� Z�;A��{P�v�^hy� J�a�U2t߬XA>A��DSS��d7������M�E�|��2��P)������]h�Bj�(�� G�%5#H<���ouacY+9X�6��

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory No date

Practice Advisory: Jae Lee v. U.S. : Establishing Prejudice under Padilla v. Kentucky

%PDF-1.7 4 0 obj << /BitsPerComponent 8 /ColorSpace /DeviceRGB /Filter /DCTDecode /Height 106 /Length 17737 /Subtype /Image /Type /XObject /Width 432 >> stream �����JFIF����������C�     ���C   ����j�"���� ���������� �������}�!1AQa"q2���#B��R��$3br� %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz����������������������������������

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory No date

Practice Advisory: New York Marijuana Decriminalization, Vacatur, and Expungement Legislation

%PDF-1.5 %���� 50 0 obj <> endobj 77 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[ <69A0FE095F623F4CAEF21D695B629F75>]/Index[50 56]/Info 49 0 R/Length 117/Prev 205991/Root 51 0 R/Size 106/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``N� � �i*�d�"��"S��XDD�d�u��σeS����$�`5� R��,�$���`�/�ٌ�{�z�����t�A� )�����3����|� endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 105 0 obj <>stream h�b```�hV ��A��X��, ;���1,Np� dƺ�Q1��Ay3�����o� �icq֊�8U���rC�r�g��n�K��j�(k^Z(t� �5Z��.;�.�m*N� ��U����KFG

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA
ACLU Practice advisory No date

Practice Advisory: Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Casas-Castrillon v. Department of Homeland Security

���Kz�_�I/m/v�zO����!�K��������_�Z�����{k���_��O����3C�m>�=�k�I%_[�����M�����������W���������_���?~�o���{׮���Re�ީ~�����������������K�-"F�"t���{�맯������L/�j� ?�o�����i}���_ڱ[���]��������a�J�}��}��ڶ�����k���k��^U_T�a�yŜO_�����z���[�h��+v��^�y�}�����6����n��J��/���oҴ�&����[ 7�"�Մ���$�*�V��Z� %v���{ &�{���2�v�_�M}�5��at��E�T0��]���U��- ��+ ��[[]X�0^�mt��lU��ku�:]�%��i]��R�VK�V��v�v ��iZ[~;�m2:m+������0���v+�+m���F q�i$�c���;�����1L_��X���HMD�8aU�VbTR�hT�+�N TS %j�S ҭl

Detention / bond Federal court Removal defense Immigration court Federal district court Direct PDF
ACLU Practice advisory No date

Practice Advisory: Prolonged Immigration Detention and Bond Eligibility: Diouf v. Napolitano

%PDF-1.3 %���� 1 0 obj << /Title (���D�i�o�u�f� �P�r�a�c�t�i�c�e� �A�d�v�i�s�o�r�y� �f�i�n�a�l) /Producer (Amyuni PDF Converter version 3.03) /CreationDate (D:20110421143248-04'00') >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Length 8 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x^uN� 1�� ���l�<@,D�~���GN��/L;Y� �����sp�S#S%a��a�b�(�a��_�J �� �@y�Z5��8J���� �E�Bk�i�n��f�S�q����� ݺkPSN}�`kmj�]�o��x�Np|_b�)S endstream endobj 8 0 obj 149 endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /XObject /Subtype /Image /Name /Im10 /Length 11 0 R

Detention / bond Federal court Removal defense Immigration court Federal district court Direct PDF