IDP Practice Advisory: Making Constitutional Arguments in the Second Circuit to Challenge Prolonged Mandatory Detention after Jennings and Lora
%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 325 0 R/ViewerPreferences 326 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��]�o�F� ��~1�}�Q;9$hr�ڽ�h�-���J��毿��%� W��u��������vv�^ao�t��E�1{{q��|�" #��q�"��L�U���/�`��o�^�x��3�qu����"ƙLE�5�uʔ]-�^&�v �[���_�|�� �ˮ>�|������ݧs�v��MP�$�P"���Fx��"R����,L���E0� �$GP��49����y�G�Xp&F
Why it matters
Useful as a practitioner-oriented overview from Immigrant Defense Project on Crimes; review the source material for the most current authority and procedure.
Topics
Crimes and categorical approach
Removal defense
Workflows
Immigration court deadline
Bond, detention, and habeas
BIA, PFR, and federal court
Crim-imm screening
Forums
Immigration court
BIA
Court of appeals
Jurisdictions
National