BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Common starting points
Immigration court deadline 606 Asylum merits package 93 Motions, stays, and pretermission 133 Bond, detention, and habeas 79 BIA, PFR, and federal court 447 USCIS and AAO appeals 209 Crim-imm screening 151 VAWA, U, T, and survivor relief 190
Workflow: Crim-imm screening Clear

Results

Showing 73-84 of 151 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Aug 15, 2019

Humanitarian Forms of Relief Part II: Asylum & SIJS

This practice advisory is the second resource in a two-part series on Humanitarian Forms of Relief for noncitizen victims of violence, serious crimes and persecution. They include: T nonimmigrant status, U nonimmigrant status, VAWA self-petition, asylum, and special immigrant juvenile status. The first advisory focused on giving an overview of VAWA, U, and T Visas. Including, eligibility requirements and some factors to consider before applying. This practice advisory will focus on giving an ove

Asylum Crimes and categorical approach Consular practice Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Aug 6, 2019

Practice Advisory: Ninth Circuit holds Calif Pen C 243(d) is a crime of violence in U.S. v. Perez

In a flawed but significant decision, the Ninth Circuit held that California Penal Code § 243(d), battery with injury, is a crime of violence. United States v. Perez (9th Cir. July 11, 2019). Because of Perez, criminal defenders must assume that § 243(d) is a crime of violence and seek other dispositions when necessary. Immigration advocates should appeal adverse decisions and preserve the argument on appeal. See this Advisory for a discussion of the decision, alternative pleas, and suggestions

Crimes and categorical approach BIA appeals BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
National Immigrant Justice Center Template motion Jul 17, 2019

Sample Motion Criminal History Chart

Call and message your members of Congress telling them to oppose any effort to give ICE and Border Patrol more funding.

Crimes and categorical approach Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jun 28, 2019

Humanitarian Forms of Relief Part I: U, T, VAWA

Noncitizen victims of violence, serious crimes, and persecution may be eligible for certain forms of immigration protection and status. These options are often referred to as Humanitarian Forms of Relief. They include: T nonimmigrant status, U nonimmigrant status, VAWA self-petition, asylum, and special immigrant juvenile status.

Asylum Crimes and categorical approach Special immigrant Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Apr 5, 2019

What Qualifies as a Conviction for Immigration Purposes?

Immigration law has its own definition of what constitutes a criminal "conviction." Because most, although not all, immigration consequences require a conviction, if your client does not have a conviction the immigration case might be saved. This Advisory discusses which dispositions that come out of criminal court actually constitute a conviction for immigration purposes, and how to avoid a conviction. It has been updated to include the BIA's decision that a conviction on direct appeal of right

Crimes and categorical approach BIA appeals BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Jan 24, 2019

Practice Advisory: The Conviction Finality Requirement in Light of Matter of J.M. Acosta : The Law Circuit-by-Circuit and Practice Strategies Before the Agency and Federal Courts (January 24, 2019, by IDP)

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 588 0 R/ViewerPreferences 589 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x���mo�:��#� �1L�Ď��� )������MӴ)���B��_�qB I�.ԫu��y��ێ�N�p��������t����i�����N��u��y� �8Yu&��o�'I��]rz�#?� ����1NLb÷�q����� Ȫ�8 ���9#� �k6t2 #�iQ�iQf�� �\L 2��xd�������n��|j6�0��f� X��h9�ԅԐ�%q8�<�\-R��U���5��78#fM

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jan 1, 2019

Advisory About the Immigration Consequences of California Methamphetamine Convictions: Lorenzo v. Sessions

In August 2018, the Ninth Circuit published an opinion holding that methamphetamine as defined under California law is not a controlled substance for federal immigration purposes. In January 2019, however, the court withdrew the published opinion, and issued a non-published opinion that came to the same conclusion. See Lorenzo v. Sessions , 902 F.3d 930 (9th Cir. 2018), withdrawn by Lorenzo v. Whitaker , 913 F.3d 930 (9th Cir. 2019), and unpublished decision at Lorenzo v. Whitaker , 752 F. App'x

Crimes and categorical approach Court of appeals Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Dec 21, 2018

Denaturalization: Understanding the Process and Recent Increases in Denaturalization Efforts

In the past, denaturalization proceedings were rare and usually brought only against alleged war criminals and in other extreme cases. However, continuing their assault on immigrants, families, and communities of color, the Trump administration has increased resources dedicated to pursuing denaturalization in an effort to strip citizenship from naturalized citizens and there are concerns this number will continue to grow. This practice advisory will briefly describe these recent efforts to incre

Crimes and categorical approach Naturalization Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Oct 15, 2018

Matter of Velasquez-Rios and 364-Day Misdemeanors

The BIA has held that that it will not give retroactive effect to California Penal Code § 18.5(a) on convictions from before January 1, 2015. It will consider a California misdemeanor conviction from before January 1, 2015 to have a potential sentence of up to one year, while a misdemeanor conviction on or after that date will have a potential sentence of up to 364 days. Having a potential sentence of just 364 days can help some immigrants who are convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude.

Crimes and categorical approach BIA appeals BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Jul 16, 2018

UPDATED Practice Advisory: Challenging the Validity of Notices to Appear Lacking Time-and-Place Information: How to use Pereira v. Sessions to overcome the “stop-time” rule and, more broadly, to challenge Immigration Court jurisdiction (updated July 16, 2018, by IDP and NIP-NLG)

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 486 0 R/ViewerPreferences 487 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��Y[s�F~g��p E',ڻ�f�1��:mR7f�i3y�A���ɸ�����%f�d�V{��w�g׽���n�Q O��N�2M�1�� ����{��eڻL&�")�|ѻZ_�4�,�˴��apv �[! �/�B0��X@��[o�E�5�[�g b޴[ ���A �8H��P�p���_Y����0q�h3z�n� �� �/ڭs����֗ W���vI���0���T��HU�B�"�C��,���<��1�

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Apr 25, 2018

Practice Advisory: Sessions v. Dimaya : Supreme Court strikes down 18 U.S.C. §16(b) as void for vagueness (April 25, 2018, by IDP and NIP-NLG)

%PDF-1.5 %���� 1 0 obj <>>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��W�n�@}���G5���F)7J ��*(<�� $.�[��̮ 8q������^�9gfvv��_����2�z� > endobj 6 0 obj <> endobj 7 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 9 0 obj <> stream �����JFIF��H�H���� Exif��MM�*������������������b�������j(�������1���� ���r2���������i���

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Apr 18, 2018

Practice Advisory: Litigating CIMT Theft Removal Charges and Adjudicative Retroactivity in the Second Circuit After Obeya v. Sessions (April 18, 2018, by IDP)

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 254 0 R/ViewerPreferences 255 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��=�r۸���?�i�:e1�'�*Ivώ�l�ɩ��<Ȗ sF"u(ʩ3?���� �&B��ojK�n4�~����U�0����ׯ&U5�\.د�n��?_��{�|�~�%��UV�nvw���r�X���lz6c�z�"���r���q*X�|�� c���ۗ/^�� >�}x���C�,~ $������ z{�/[X�}�w�y���_=6�'����sX�_�8n~v��c��*A��E

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record