BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files

Results

Showing 697-708 of 892 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory No date

IDP and NYU Immigrant Rights Clinic and Practice Advisory: Making Statutory Arguments in the Second Circuit on the Meaning of “When…Released” and “Released” in U.S.C. § 1226(c) To Challenge Mandatory Detention After Jennings and Lora

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��\mo�F� �a?J��r��|9l�=$h�\�^Q��"�6�T�b��C��73��d��4��D� �gvvv�w�" B���H�"��$�DS�|��7�z�����o��B� ����� ׅB�(K�D�ƁJ�����U"�Zx���O���ϗ/�3bz���i�� �����~���w����/~� �t a�M�4P�@_IMa�E�� ��@ SӅq�[WJ���~�(p��q��,gwE&^��>��>5J�� �t~9Փ�7�S3��B49�������+��ǟ����� =��h '�̃�G� | ?

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory No date

IDP Practice Advisory: Making Constitutional Arguments in the Second Circuit to Challenge Prolonged Mandatory Detention after Jennings and Lora

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 325 0 R/ViewerPreferences 326 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��]�o�F� ��~1�}�Q;9$hr�ڽ�h�-���J��毿��%� W��u��������vv�^ao޼�t��E�1{{q��|�" #��q�"��L�U���/�`��o�^�x��3�qu����"ƙLE�5�uʔ]-�^&�v �[���_�|�� �ˮ>�|������ݧs�v��MP�$�P"���Fx��"R����,L���E0� �$GP��49����y�G�Xp&F

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
ACLU Practice advisory No date

Immigration Judges’ Authority to Grant Release on Conditional Parole Under INA § 236(a) as an Alternative to Release on a Monetary Bond: Rivera v. Holder

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1139 0 obj <> endobj 1160 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[ ]/Index[1139 37]/Info 1138 0 R/Length 95/Prev 2949561/Root 1140 0 R/Size 1176/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream h�bbd``b`>�$� ��@�u)H,D���1�6 BD�I���� �h��,��|b  �@� H,f`bdjb```������3@����L endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 1175 0 obj <>stream h�b```�u � , B  �ae`a��d`�I�8f�!$�Z9�����b6 V�f�r@����~@ă3�q�Cz���i�; �$#Xk���9HG�F2^v(Q]±�1���4� ��U�9�xfnؙ�?+�Y��-O3�͹�m��|� 9I�c-�' �[!��:��?�d�Q���9

Detention / bond Federal court Removal defense Immigration court Federal district court Direct PDF
National Immigration Litigation Alliance Practice advisory No date

Introduction to Federal Court Practice in District Court

%PDF-1.6 %���� 280 0 obj <> endobj 300 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<4D49AD69701B0E4580081EB1664A45BD><3137A1C0F7BD704F8D9FB9F179DEA1CD>]/Index[280 29]/Info 279 0 R/Length 99/Prev 225913/Root 281 0 R/Size 309/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``�� 3@$S X�#�]&=�"�`R L �����"��&���!y�H2�8 6�D�����Q&F��`{ �� �0���9 endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 308 0 obj <>stream h�b```�) � |W�@��(����������9����߁���dC���� �Dttt4�ղ�̸q��y 2�Z �"��1�t40*� �131���L X-�!��t|

Federal court Motions to reopen / reconsider Federal district court Court of appeals Direct PDF
Immigrant Defense Project Checklist No date

Issue-Spotting Finality Arguments in Immigration Practice: Checklist for Immigration Attorneys Representing Clients with Criminal Convictions in Affirmative Applications and Removal Proceedings

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 147 0 R/ViewerPreferences 148 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��\�r�H}w��� a�-��҄�4mOxb����}σ ��6H4��?���y�J�\�_Re]�rNf��޼�G٠罺�c5��/뺜�y~������c^du^緋���˲V��K��C_|;=���W�zB��~Ʃ'����_?����������+\��w�����I�"�� wS���X V�c�u�W�F-F�2`���I�,[��s<���,䋚�U� 2�:/ �f�N�SE]�� 

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
National Immigration Litigation Alliance Practice advisory No date

Litigating Injunctions in Federal Court

%PDF-1.6 %���� 401 0 obj <> endobj 428 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[ <16FC5834181DDE46AF877B6BAC1B2AE2>]/Index[401 49]/Info 400 0 R/Length 124/Prev 253191/Root 402 0 R/Size 450/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``^"g��2ɪ o��LQ`R,� f��Uj��;��`]0{?�<�="YD��`5 ��D2��H��@���J۳DN��_��ʀncd`T��g`�+�����-@���3| endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 449 0 obj <>stream h�b```�u � �\ B  ce`a������������w�5|��5�9����b��p�C�� ��o�52�� Ny �x�ث�W���M���������v!�^��(;�t�<�q�dk� �q�

Federal court Motions to reopen / reconsider Federal district court Court of appeals Direct PDF
National Immigration Litigation Alliance Practice advisory No date

Mandamus and APA Actions for Special Immigrant Juvenile Petitions

%PDF-1.7 %���� 422 0 obj <> endobj 442 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<635F11DD25B29045BC185DE6CD26D051><83405408656E71478D8BCF3C7B341450>]/Index[422 82]/Info 421 0 R/Length 106/Prev 323991/Root 423 0 R/Size 504/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``�"��٧@$' �� D2���@$�"�H;X�(�< ��f��������s�ؕWA윛 R%H��������h � >stream h�b```b``f``e`�Qcb@�!�0+ G���ěs�HЖ������k�`G� �3\ Y��p�*���tw�Z�>V�dgϥ��=7n��8�j��4����231��33�\ fE\`�h`�``�h`��`�h`�$@b� �  �`&�m � D� �X����

Federal court Motions to reopen / reconsider Federal district court Court of appeals Direct PDF
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project Practice advisory No date

Mendez Rojas v. Wolf: Practice Advisory and FAQ for Practitioners

"�d���@�W��l�f�@߰�F�����Y�-�zjH&�����g��� U�:~�A�c!�0 ��7v���ܸ�'�� ['��M�S�mK�=`Mc'B �L{ˆm���%a�*2�i]<�&���M��� �l�ް��dy�!s��G-��2\�3+U+F����� �?��S���-�L[���{���af�������.w3���N�^ ��bf���������wǼ�T+5�ϼ�T+��[���J͑�����b��qw�G���ˎ �������U�M�t�cjW�ew Q���b��d�53��}zm2nV� *�{�y?2�P��aݮ��f��b�"�~�r¸����t�nAq��~)��7����m�Z�����dܦ-rRb�{�1Q �79ƭ�� Rb��$�Pps���qC3��5�j(�=m�y�C[�vv��ֿ��sG{��ak'��������&55�6~�1�5��,ְhu?hci��:�j{_��� �"���&��������c� � �L^ �$��#k��d ��

Federal court Removal defense Evidence and procedure USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Human Rights First PALA Library Template motion No date

Model Immigration Court Filings in Support of Fictional Indigenous Asylum Claim

Model immigration court filings prepared by Human Rights First attorney Andrew Feinberg in January 2025. These model filings reflect some of the most common documents and motions an attorney will file in support of a client’s asylum case in immigration court. The materials are intended to be reviewed simultaneously, as part of a single fictional case for a Guatemalan indigenous asylum claim in removal proceedings in the Ninth Circuit. The documents consist of the following:

Asylum Withholding / CAT Evidence and procedure USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project Practice advisory No date

Nightingale v. USCIS: Practice Advisory

%PDF-1.6 %���� 407 0 obj <> endobj 434 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<54F58E26CD32E84E942EB12E7E9A2030> ]/Index[407 68]/Info 406 0 R/Length 126/Prev 316816/Root 408 0 R/Size 475/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``���3�� ɱ�6�V�H& �H�d����A$�8��&���0�L>�!�@�q:X��; v�Q��l�0��w���O�00120��D�bÜ�����@����� endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 474 0 obj <>stream h�b```�� � � B  ce`a��qȠE����� OT��8|*�ba`����U+8���c �D�=��8��~�:�z��]}��e�>�S�MJ"�(_?m|�M�-������J2�X

Federal court Removal defense Evidence and procedure USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF