Understanding Immigration Detainers: An Overview for State Defense Counsel
Enforcement Publication Date Jul 22, 2013 Share Downloads File Understanding Immigration Detainers Audience Practitioners
Practice resources
Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.
Enforcement Publication Date Jul 22, 2013 Share Downloads File Understanding Immigration Detainers Audience Practitioners
%PDF-1.3 %���� 19 0 obj <> endobj 41 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<6F08DF95002CF87C7676E168D139367B><7C4C31F4AA69487D9C324926C8CEADEF>]/Index[19 37]/Info 18 0 R/Length 107/Prev 148888/Root 20 0 R/Size 56/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``� "�@$�ɲDJH��]��R0[D�m��*`�L��J`� L2�I�i\�@d�O)v H2�j�eAf�����t�"�� �T �30>�`�/J endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 55 0 obj <>stream h�b```e``�f`a`�kdd@�A�+s|�Rr+@b�'�, 00p4�0X ��L"����E�0000���1L;�P�%�E�%�ŏş���^����J9��92 ; �p2
This practice advisory discusses the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision in Matter of Davey, 26 I&N Dec. 37 (BIA 2012) and its holding that the categorical approach does not apply to the “possession of 30 grams of marijuana” exception to deportability found in 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i), INA § 237(a)(2)(B)(i).
���T�E%p����ST�rD�n��o� ��$M���w�P�(�/of܌��P�|�J a-q�!E�=��C��R���V��׳�g�T�4V.mE���=��*�L��0�#��[��1���;s�͵�p�� �i����t��\��eJ�1�8 !@Nr���)�:B1�f|� ����-��m� `ԏ��n��b����pOL 0k����`� �����I��6 h�M�ˮ �ݽ�J`��9U��\���W���!�����u�L�W���/nH!�Wa�[�&�HL�R�u�o�ڪ&��&�t�y��62�H:�0� ��3��~�E8�fNU�D B� ŘR��\ iO��q��"�(X��Z�8���B5�rR�f��&��`�*���Up�� �K�4��zX Ҭ�+��k hݗ�M�U �jH��qfo�T��_���i.�M�>j�� ��~.@���R*P�_]�A�v�e��J*?�٨�ȎLqjϼ��`Y�A�h��L��G�!�W:�@����W
%PDF-1.3 %��������� 4 0 obj << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x�]�s��u� (^CrčA����c�\qMEt��\'�-�*.+������{��{�8ghg�"0@��W�n@I�K��%����W��v�v�6����w���o~)�/�����/�ge�~�I�G��H���~�֍���ǟ���E��E��c�I/��?�� �W07y��i�z�m�7}�iYg}� J�BFI:CI2��x%#i$��h�m�4A$s��B��H�e�:�Ӯ�֫#ٖ��HG�JE�^1G�_�X�e^g]��/z�� ��W�'ǧ��"� �Ù;� ]$r��i�.<]��1/\����!�� �Kw�?pr|���K�v��� F�9}�SM���:+/���u�zi&b�C�)�mVm�]��EV�@� ˋ$ϪtS]���?��(r�t��DE�C�p�{8���� �:ݜ����uM�5�&���PD���
eV�#+fC �SЦ�1�Yɓ! �YL��<���� �D�/�n�����%ӧ��W<`lo���k�|���\�R䝾��JX� Mz}g���:�l� ����b��s�"��ŷ�^�5G�/䁦�{���/P' ƚA{Š�G���܂BnI�d��Q���Hs `�歎ۀ�z�l2�e��#�^��/��os:�o�:4O]�l `�=�9���Yr���Cn���˔��W�f_���mE��<�uu͈�f�*\.im}�i�o�xf�[�K`���$M,\Z/��i���k���m ߱����Y��m��@>�=��H4�/��x�� @k 1� K��n@~J��F�t�<a*�l�dK�����������\�LOS�ξ�)����LM�&�|n�drdp]�A�P����t��� �WSD�7�r�� '}�͎��j��m�>�;|�[�.�b� ͙�hp���/�j:�����Ѭ4 B� 3>���Y�eM5�_�J�V��2�� �%�5���{��yrD'U0���� �i���f��-
%PDF-1.3 %��������� 4 0 obj << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x��ٲlWv��|�4��#��+���V(Z�u� � �B��!aP��|�s5�{�#U��*B�䟳 �s���k�����߶���|�l�����o��u�?�?��7��������Z����ԟ��a{>�_o����o����|��Ɵ��o���a��~���������l��cM�8�ayg{<�8�g��q�����`�����b.���i{��^ϗy��_�?����w� ~��h�]��������~����Ԛ��z����t��,�w8]^O��D�e�mO1H��L�8BOqx3��LS\_��i���=����;��n8�= �%�s3�� R K� K��� Co��������z?���M ϗ����������m���9�O�� >E��*�-�6M��B�����;��5�>Z�흍������x�jQ����_/��~wx%�'�w=�� :��
%PDF-1.3 %��������� 4 0 obj << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x��ٲ��u��|�6�)I{W� ��Jl�щ�s�(BrTa�l�D�'ߘs�M�>� )��Α��������������o��n{�^���i����y�߷_�����mw���}����p����z�^O���e���_�ߜ�����ۯ߿�o����m�n�����n��}u������r��t��� m~��Χ���45s������?l��8�簿l �9 ���O��y�� !��Zގ����|9��N����z��T���~��w�����o����7��R��(�nd�"_����/�骋��������R����ty=�>�� �(vxlatqxӅ�L]\_��S/C<�����qܝ_o7�= ��3g� �l�y����m���t9���������|9�����Sr���%� r���v���${���x0J����B3�Pg�;��΄�^ ����?����.�
This advisory describes (1) the Court’s decision in Vartelas ; (2) its potential impact on LPRs who take brief trips abroad; (3) suggested steps that lawyers (or immigrants themselves) may take immediately in pending or already concluded removal proceedings involving such individuals; and (4) some of the other potential favorable impacts of the decision.
Testimony before an IJ may not be used to characterize an offense, or to link two documents from the record of conviction. A Ninth Circuit panel has withdrawn a very bad opinion on the modified categorical approach and substituted a substantially better one.
Practice Advisory: California Health and Safety Code § 11357(b) prohibits possession of not more than 28.5 grams of marijuana. After January 1, 2011 it will be treated as an infraction.
Crimes Publication Date Mar 22, 2011 Share Downloads File Practice Advisory: Alyazji Moral Turpitude Deportation Grounds Audience Practitioners