BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
918 resources 24 sources 848 direct files
Workflow: Immigration court deadline Clear

Results

Showing 373-384 of 624 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Nov 11, 2015

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division ruling

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia decision regarding Plaintiff’s (European Connections & Tours) challenge of IMBRA under the First and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution; specifically challenging the portions of the IMBRA statute relating to the disclosure of background information and the definition of International Marriage Brokers. Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s Complaint.

Removal defense Family-based practice Federal court Federal district court Direct PDF
ACLU Practice advisory Nov 6, 2015

Challenging Detention Without a Bond Hearing Pending Removal Proceedings

Challenging Detention Without a Bond Hearing Pending Removal Proceedings | American Civil Liberties Union Skip navigation Fact Sheet Challenging Detention Without a Bond Hearing Pending Removal Proceedings Document Date: November 6, 2015 Download document Download document Skip to PDF content Related Issues Immigrants' Rights Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Detention / bond Federal court Removal defense Immigration court Federal district court Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Oct 12, 2015

Responding to Inappropriate RFEs & NOIDs in SIJS Cases

This practice advisory describes the recent increase in RFEs and NOIDs in Special Immigrant Juvenile Status cases, in which USCIS is requesting documents from the underlying state court proceedings. The advisory details arguments against disclosing state court documents and information to USCIS, and provides guidance on setting up your SIJS petitions for success from the outset.

Special immigrant Children and SIJS USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Jun 8, 2015

Mellouli v. Lynch: Further Support for a Strict Categorical Approach for Determining Removability Under Drug Deportation and Other Conviction-Based Removal Grounds

Practice Advisory Issue area Removal Defense Audience Attorney Published: Jun. 8, 2015 Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Copy Link to Clipboard Copy to Clipboard Download Practice Advisory

Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Apr 17, 2015

Practice Advisory: Return to the United States After Prevailing on a Petition for Review or Motion to Reopen or Reconsider

This practice advisory contains practical and legal suggestions for individuals seeking to return to the United States after they have prevailed on a petition for review or a motion to reopen or reconsider to the immigration court or Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).

Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider BIA appeals Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Mar 12, 2015

Special Immigrant Juvenile Status: A Primer for One-Parent Cases

Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) cases, involving a claim of abuse, abandonment or neglect against one parent while the child resides with the non-offending parent, are commonly referred to as one-parent cases. These cases, though permissible under the plain language of the statute as well as federal agency interpretation, have proved challenging particularly at the state court phase of the application process and at times before U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the age

Naturalization Special immigrant Children and SIJS USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Feb 1, 2015

Practice Advisory: U Conditional Approvals (February 2015)

%PDF-1.5 %���� 726 0 obj <> endobj 740 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<86AF9D23A3996E49B1E1D442BA436B49><6B0631BAE8E84B3FB560B83375B3E141>]/Index[726 39]/Info 725 0 R/Length 75/Prev 217992/Root 727 0 R/Size 765/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream h�bbd``b`� 5@��H����j���`�� �� ��"�A�t q(�Ȕ 2���~����� �# : endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 764 0 obj <>stream h�b```�T��Ad`��0p,�� �H75�w�%�u��C�C����a{������]Źj�$%ߞ���Dn���w����6��~�-������A�����!���-� ���B��ݢ���

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory May 29, 2014

Practice Advisory: Best Evidence, Credibility, and Any Credible Evidence (May 29, 2014)

%PDF-1.6 %���� 72 0 obj <>stream h�D��j�0Ee���H4V��C��@Iܪ�E�N�E#p< �iӯ�-���9�5 �v�Zwޞ��R�a5�O�|�$��W�i��KuH�s��� D��X\�X�.�~�h9��TI!UM���D�K�,̢���"N�r�ڡ IԾ��gx�盹���'�W �s�b�^"wA���M�Gq)�0>h�{�"��xwo����0�~�F� endstream endobj 73 0 obj <>stream h�2U0P0S06S���w�/�+Q0���L)�64����T��$����E�� � ? endstream endobj 74 0 obj <>stream hޜVmo�6�+������6d�n�5�f;M6�0T[u��R )K����JS+s�� �����玒�0"%�HE8�Dj!�a<��g�Ċi�ќʼn�� �'J.�V8�5f��e��K<��))p���$���Ps�� n���I�'N:L�ׯ

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Dec 1, 2013

ASISTA Initial Advisory: U Visa Cap and Practice Pointers from VSC Stakeholder Teleconference on 12/12/13 (December 2013)

%PDF-1.3 %��������� 4 0 obj << /Length 5 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode >> stream x��ms�ȑ���S �⊾Z3��ܕ�|��ĩ��&�w�*��LE�e�+R�\>����=��l�6�0=���~.�X�\��ߪ����* v�O�}�_�tC׫ټZ�f�\,��ů//�YY���M1�ճ��o�o.�T=�f�mQ/g���X��UQ.f�z9H8=�# \�?�7ūgŢ�^}|V<��i�/�S\�^t�X���z1N��:=+��3�� W���~ ><+J���eYL_��(��x��ݳ��e1ݟ��{n��;ㄱ�.c����u1=e�em��џL� /^���NW�w��;~T )��G#�.�k�fD�)�ܶ U��lQ��rV&G�u}).&�������L` M��w)��<�Z��g��x�X��cS����g�u�ڔص��cV혈�\įw�&�0+����"���KX��WE5υ��^��M=�`Y'#���Z���v��K

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF