BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Common starting points
Immigration court deadline 606 Asylum merits package 93 Motions, stays, and pretermission 133 Bond, detention, and habeas 79 BIA, PFR, and federal court 447 USCIS and AAO appeals 209 Crim-imm screening 151 VAWA, U, T, and survivor relief 190
Workflow: Immigration court deadline Clear

Results

Showing 313-324 of 606 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
ASISTA Practice advisory Dec 5, 2018

Annotated Notes and Practice Pointers: USCIS Teleconference on Notice to Appear (NTA) Updated Policy Guidance (December 5, 2018)

%PDF-1.5 %���� 258 0 obj <> endobj 283 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<1503034BCB2D4AA1E8EB99CB760A321F><8EC3B77A915D448F96E194F5FA3D06E6>]/Index[258 40]/Info 257 0 R/Length 117/Prev 493929/Root 259 0 R/Size 298/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``y"�d �4�L�A$��= ,� f���z�H�� &?�E��IN0� "C^�ȈL ��ab����@�� )�Q�$���3�����l;� *��Y����_ endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 297 0 obj <>stream h�b```�hV�� �  cc`a�X�eР��$�Z�R,g2D�|_2�C��i>f/�Y ��57��``��b�`�i�u���P��

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ACLU Practice advisory Oct 23, 2018

Practice Advisory: Bond Hearings for Individuals Subject to Prolonged Detention: Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden, York County Prison

Practice Advisory: Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden, York County Prison | American Civil Liberties Union Skip navigation document Practice Advisory: Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden, York County Prison Document Date: October 23, 2018 Download document Download document Skip to PDF content

Detention / bond Federal court Removal defense Immigration court Federal district court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ASISTA Practice advisory Sep 27, 2018

2018 Notes from National Stakeholder Engagement Updated Notice to Appear (NTA) Policy Guidance (September 27, 2018)

�Eq͵�<-H� V` �W�@� ���3Y�ˋ6%� #����qn�3�#�޲��QC�Jl��KS�ӌ�:���C� BކE� �@�cpV�݃.+i#����l�0P� �� ���2���/ ��UM��(8fq�7(~4`�f3�Q@UiD���K�ٲ%�̆� �����d���ίV2��`K�M�J���k�v�6�5�e��[K���P��,7=��Y%��1���X!�sLt���Z#Bf2��F�Ͽ�q #}-٘ S��Z���L�� � )6Ѯs�wY�6��ޅ�;�������yY�^j�}�m�p��*k�n�#!�,�M1��\"-�^ �j6IS��i�5\�ȁ6�q.I�}`{�w���c�f�N3�g�P�Q ?N��t.g �@�%6�W�]��)p��M9�0PꚇN��r�� B�ǥ�c��E���rW�h��# ��!�O>G��YqO2X� ���h�J���@��A�ݵG�^�gsL^E<�G�E� ��\�_gG�I���@n

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Sep 10, 2018

Motions for a Continuance

This Practice Advisory provides a practitioner-focused overview of motions to continue a case in removal proceedings, from the basics of making a continuance motion to jurisdictional bars to appellate review of continuances. It provides an overview of continuance practice in immigration court, summarizing guidance from the Executive Office for Immigration Review discouraging the use of continuances and case law establishing scenarios where continuances are appropriate. It also sets forth strateg

Removal defense Evidence and procedure Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Aug 31, 2018

Risks of Applying for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) in Affirmative Cases

USCIS recently issued updated guidance on when it will refer a person to Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) or issue a Notice to Appear (NTA, the charging document that begins a case in immigration court). Advocates must consult this memorandum in evaluating the risk of referral in individual cases, as it now requires USCIS to issue an NTA in any case in which, “upon issuance of an unfavorable decision on an application, petition, or benefit request, the alien is not lawfully present in the

Removal defense Special immigrant Children and SIJS USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Aug 20, 2018

Bivens Basics : An Introductory Guide for Immigration Attorneys

Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), individuals—including noncitizens or those whom the government perceives to be noncitizens—may have access to a judicial remedy for conduct by federal agents that violates the U.S. Constitution. Although litigating Bivens claims in the immigration context has become increasingly challenging in recent years, a successful claim could result in compensatory and/or punitive

Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ASISTA Practice advisory Aug 1, 2018

Practice Advisory: Fee Waivers for VAWA Self-petitions, U and T Visa Applications (August 2018)

%PDF-1.6 %���� 125 0 obj <> endobj 137 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<9C84F6FCB73945679B427097A4533D0E><5386B4E39B8F48809C729BE973DB28D1>]/Index[125 22]/Info 124 0 R/Length 73/Prev 245315/Root 126 0 R/Size 147/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream h�bbd``b`� �@�q�+$ص��d !�$�����W a���$�2012���20 �3��0��w  endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 146 0 obj <>stream h�b```f``r� �   ���� � O@�M9�z�* �ܜżv �X?s�v10ht�O��h``Vݒ�� &���18��t������J��D'+ } �F� ��0��@����al8��" Pc`<�Hs�0Xd

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jul 18, 2018

Strategies and Considerations in the Wake of Pereira v. Sessions

In Pereira v. Sessions , the Court held that service of a defective Notice to Appear does not cut off eligibility for cancellation of removal. The rationale underlying the Court’s decision, however, more broadly affects both ongoing and closed cases initiated by defective Notices to Appear.

Removal defense Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Jul 16, 2018

UPDATED Practice Advisory: Challenging the Validity of Notices to Appear Lacking Time-and-Place Information: How to use Pereira v. Sessions to overcome the “stop-time” rule and, more broadly, to challenge Immigration Court jurisdiction (updated July 16, 2018, by IDP and NIP-NLG)

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 486 0 R/ViewerPreferences 487 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��Y[s�F~g��p E',ڻ�f�1��:mR7f�i3y�A���ɸ�����%f�d�V{��w�g׽���n�Q O��N�2M�1�� ����{��eڻL&�")�|ѻZ_�4�,�˴��apv �[! �/�B0��X@��[o�E�5�[�g b޴[ ���A �8H��P�p���_Y����0q�h3z�n� �� �/ڭs����֗ W���vI���0���T��HU�B�"�C��,���<��1�

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ACLU Practice advisory Jul 1, 2018

Practice Advisory: Parole of Arriving Asylum Seekers who have Passed Credible Fear, Damus v. Nielsen

The American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, Human Rights First, and Covington & Burling LLP filed a federal lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s arbitrary detention of asylum seekers fleeing persecution, torture, or death in their countries of origin.

Detention / bond Federal court Removal defense Immigration court Federal district court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Sample brief Jun 27, 2018

Case Update: The Domestic Violence Deportation Ground

The domestic violence deportation ground at INA § 237(a)(2)(E) sets out four bases for deportability. Recent Board of Immigration Appeals and federal decisions, including the Supreme Court decision in Sessions v. Dimaya , significantly affect each of the four bases. This advisory will provide a brief overview of the deportation ground, and then outline the recent decisions and how they may affect representation in California and the Ninth Circuit. It includes an appendix analyzing common Califor

Removal defense BIA appeals BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jun 6, 2018

Non-LPR Cancellation of Removal: An Overview of Eligibility for Immigration Practitioners

Cancellation of removal for Non–Permanent Residents under INA § 240A(b)(1) is a critical defense to deportation available to certain non-citizens with family in the United States. A person who is granted non-LPR cancellation of removal receives a green card, but the eligibility requirements for non-LPR cancellation are distinct from other means of applying for a green card, and also from other types of cancellation of removal. It is important for immigration practitioners to be familiar with non

Removal defense Family-based practice Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record