Know Your VAWA Options: Self-Petition Compared with Special Rule Cancellation of Removal
Chart-based comparison of VAWA self-petitions and VAWA special-rule cancellation of removal, with eligibility and strategy differences called out side by side.
Practice resources
Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.
Chart-based comparison of VAWA self-petitions and VAWA special-rule cancellation of removal, with eligibility and strategy differences called out side by side.
%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 4 0 obj <> endobj 11 0 obj <> endobj 13 0 obj <> stream x�}��J�`� kA�A� \��h���X\[�V�4M�؟�������&.ހ�e(��%���o$����{x�/�@$�*�N�s˥�Q� S�L��eZ}����K�}^�'7��v���!y�.�'��V��>�����s<���^�(���F�>���7�V�=���f���WtV�%J��-�جS�#LQ�"��'IB� EN��Py�zfISP�Y��H)����� ���@� &/C�~�{ �e�6�����1]shE�H� ��0W��'�9�]�Y�?����bM��4 �?��K� endstream endobj 12 0 obj <> stream x�콇{S��.�/|�}�=��_�U]H/'9i����$W5IB��E�+=@ ��{/Ү�\hl �w[�|3
Addresses strategy when inadmissibility issues surface late in a U-visa case and explains how to preserve the case rather than treating the new issue as fatal.
%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 4 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> endobj 12 0 obj <> stream x�}��J�`� kA�A� \��h���X\[�V�4M�؟�������&.ހ�e(��%���o$����{x�/�@$�*�N�s˥�Q� S�L��eZ}����K�}^�'7��v���!y�.�'��V��>�����s<���^�(���F�>���7�V�=���f���WtV�%J��-�جS�#LQ�"��'IB� EN��Py�zfISP�Y��H)����� ���@� &/C�~�{ �e�6�����1]shE�H� ��0W��'�9�]�Y�?����bM��4 �?��K� endstream endobj 11 0 obj <> stream x��}�_Y�������k��Pw�-n�յ�{O���]�a��u�m��S�!��J� ��!$����"�"$7��'
In a case brought in Federal District Court in Rhode Island an abused spouse whose VAWA self-petition had been approved challenged USCIS’s revocation of her approved petition. The self-petitioner was divorced from her abuser and remarried after filing the self-petition but before the self-petition had been approved. The court’s ruling allows the self-petitioner to fully litigate her challenge the USCIS’s revocation of her self-petition due to remarriage in Federal District Court. The court’s rul
%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> stream x�}��J�`� kA�A� \��h���X\[�V�4M�؟�������&.ހ�e(��%���o$����{x�/�@$�*�N�s˥�Q� S�L��eZ}����K�}^�'7��v���!y�.�'��V��>�����s<���^�(���F�>���7�V�=���f���WtV�%J��-�جS�#LQ�"��'IB� EN��Py�zfISP�Y��H)����� ���@� &/C�~�{ �e�6�����1]shE�H� ��0W��'�9�]�Y�?����bM��4 �?��K� endstream endobj 9 0 obj <> stream x��w|W�>����|~ﻛ۪.�l����.� )[rU�$���!��q�� �6@$!ͽ�T�Ir��zs�Er�w�r�E6�᠏,͌�43�=��s
%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 4 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> stream x�c``<��, �y%EA�N �Q �� �� p��o� j/��Q� p��'�@,S� h$�-�a+��I� �]^RPd{��E!A�@v �����NBb'�Է��6�9��w3��C�2 C���,�200O@�%�d`���� q !����� h��1DX$%��X��)-����r�H� \Ѱ���&�y2 � �@�ΐÐ �d�cHf��� ��[=� endstream endobj 9 0 obj <> stream x�콅_���?����ϱ�XQ�9�s�c�"5�Q*�������t��݁I��K�P� %������fcl�6�� χǃcq�����.��;up��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p�
%PDF-1.3 %��������� 3 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 7773 >> stream x�]i� ���^��Hq8=����:l�D�u����?l0��7D�ZZ��2 P�TuS��Nw���e"�@U�����gy��/u����r�~y�Kձ��w�a���ܔ�ߔ�/��7ğ���ۦ�������˦�˗?��G7���*_�y���� ʩ�����˿���?f� �n�� ڕ~�n�����4 �j����� /�=s���������XOcY�� 7��=`�B��5c_N�Ŕ�cU #�#�]; ����zX�������p{x���r�?�)��p��˃����n�!]U ^�ܔ����]w�7���|� ݗ;G��M���� X�A@*�w�=f~ ��Tg^L���2��P�Q=#"�I�?k���oD�]|H"��H���D{�^t���@3��_�d�9R�z�+ �� \+���a�,��M_��|���������q����?� ��0�D��
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) VAWA, U, and T National Committee coordinated a stakeholder meeting with USCIS on November 16, 2023. USCIS was represented by officials from the Office of Policy & Strategy, Service Center Operations, the Vermont Service Center, and the Public Engagement Division. These notes were compiled by VAWA, U, and T National Committee members and reflect USCIS responses to questions posed by the committee and partners. USCIS’s official responses to the
In October 2021, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued its T Visa Law Enforcement Resource Guide. The guide, published alongside updated guidance on T visas in the USCIS Policy Manual (USCIS-PM), advises law enforcement agencies on providing T visa certifications, a crucial form of evidence in T visa applications. This practice advisory gives an overview of the resource guide and how practitioners can utilize it to advocate for law enforcement agencies to provide law enforcement
The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) represents Jennifer Arguijo, who was 11 years old when her mother married her stepfather, who turned out to be abusive. Applying BIA case law from other contexts, VSC held that a stepchild-stepfather relationship ends after the biological parent divorces the stepparent, unless there is a “continuing relationship” between the stepchild and stepfather. NIJC sought reconsideration, and appealed to the AAO. The AAO affirmed the VSC’s decision to deny the
Geidy Mavely Soto Alvarado And Mauricio Antonio Garcia Soto v. Merrick Garland (June 13 2023) US District Court of Rhode Island. NIWAP, represented by Crowell and Moring, led an amicus brief that was joined by Harvard Law School professors and clinics, the ACLU, the Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence, and all of the major women shelters in Rhode Island. This brief argued that USCIS had misinterpreted VAWA 2000 amendments that were designed to allow VAWA self petitioners to divorce,