BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
918 resources 24 sources 848 direct files
Topic: Family-based practice Clear Workflow: BIA, PFR, and federal court Clear

Results

Showing 13-24 of 109 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
ASISTA Practice advisory Jun 1, 2024

ASISTA Practice Advisory: Establishing Employment Authorization for T and U Nonimmigrants Without an EAD Card (Updated in June 2024)

%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> stream x�}��J�`� kA�A� \��h���X\[�V�4M�؟�������&.ހ�e(��%���o$����{x�/�@$�*�N�s˥�Q� S�L��eZ}����K�}^�'7��v���!y�.�'��V��>�����s<���^�(���F�>–���7�V�=���f���WtV�%J��-�جS�#LQ�"��'IB� EN��Py�zfISP�Y��H)����� ���@� &/C�~�{ �e�6�����1]shE�H� ��0W��'�9�]�Y�?����bM��4 �?��K� endstream endobj 9 0 obj <> stream x��w|W�>����|~ﻛ۪.�l����.� )[rU�$���!��q�� �6@$!ͽ�T�Ir��zs�Er�w�r�E6�᠏,͌�43�=��s

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Jun 1, 2024

ASISTA Practice Advisory: Establishing Employment Authorization for T and U Nonimmigrants Without an EAD Card (Updated in June 2024)

%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 4 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> stream x�c``<��, �y%EA�N �Q �� �� p��o� j/��Q� p��'�@,S� h$�-�a+��I� �]^RPd{��E!A�@v �����NBb'�Է��6�9��w3��C�2 C���,�200O@�%�d`���� q !����� h��1DX$%��X��)-����r�H� \Ѱ���&�y2 � �@�ΐÐ �d�cHf���  ��[=� endstream endobj 9 0 obj <> stream x�콅_���?����ϱ�XQ�9�s�c�"5�Q*�������t��݁I��K�P� %������fcl�6�� χǃcq�����.��;up��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p�

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Jun 1, 2024

ASISTA Practice Advisory: Reinstatement of Removal and Immigrant Survivors (June 2024)

%PDF-1.3 %��������� 3 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 7773 >> stream x�]i� ���^��Hq8=����:l�D�u����?l0��7D�ZZ��2 P�TuS��Nw���e"�@U�����gy��/u����r�~y�Kձ��w�a���ܔ�ߔ�/��7ğ���ۦ�������˦�˗?��G7���*_�y���� ʩ�����˿���?f� �n�� ڕ~�n�����4 �j����� /�=s���������XOcY�� 7��=`�B��5c_N�Ŕ�cU #�#�]; ����zX�������p{x���r�?�)��p��˃����n�!]U ^�ܔ����]w�7���|� ݗ;G��M���� X�A@*�w�=f~ ��T׭g^L���2��P�Q=#"�I�?k���oD�]|H"��H���D{�^t���@3��_�d�9R�z�+ �� \+���a�,��M_��|���������q����?� ��0�D��

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Resource directory Apr 25, 2024

Public Benefits Access for Immigrants

Jane Doe v. Claire McIntire (August 10, 2001) Commonwealth of Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. NOW Legal Defense Team, represented by Foley, Hoag & Eliot, Pro Bono, filed an amicus brief appealing a denial of TANF benefits to two immigrant women lawfully residing in Massachusetts, the denial was based on six month residence requirement before receiving benefits. One woman was fleeing domestic violence and the other residing with family during pregnancy.

Family-based practice BIA appeals BIA Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Resource directory Apr 25, 2024

Trauma, Testimony, and Adult Victims

Gabriel Perez Cruz v. Barr , (July 2 2020) U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit. NIWAP assisted the Family Violence Appellate Project in California in developing, securing social science support for and national sign ons from 16 organizations nationally for this 9th Circuit Amicus Brief in which we were represented by Haney and Boone LLP. The brief discussed the mental health impact of domestic violence and coercive control in abusive relationships and perpetrators who coerce their victims into com

Removal defense Family-based practice BIA appeals BIA Court of appeals
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Dec 21, 2023

Practice Advisory: Navigating Family-Based Claims Following Matter of M-R-M-S

On December 1, 2023, the Board of Immigration Appeals issued a precedential decision, Matter of M‑R‑M‑S‑, 28 I&N Dec. 757 (BIA 2023), which purports to narrow the circumstances in which asylum seekers can prove that their membership in a family-based particular social group can meet the “one central reason” nexus standard. This practice advisory discusses the BIA opinion, explains how it intersects with existing court of appeals case law, and provides practical tips for practitioners on how to f

Asylum Family-based practice BIA appeals BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Resource directory Oct 20, 2023

The International Marriage Broker Regulation Act

European Connections & Tours, Inc. v. Gonzales , (April 24 2006) United States District Court For Northern District of Georgia. Legal Momentum/NOW, represented by Crowell and Moring, in publishing social science research, legislative history, and editorial assistance to the Tahirih Justice Center in an amicus brief submitted supporting the U.S. Attorney General in a motion to dismiss a 1st Amendment challenge to the collection of data on male clients for prospective brides and 5th Amendment Equa

Family-based practice Federal court Federal district court
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Oct 2, 2023

Ruiz v. Carrasco ,

Amicus brief in the case of Antonio Ruiz v. Wendy R. Carrasco, case nos. 98-FM-39 98-FM-40 on issues of civil protection orders. Ruiz v. Carrasco, DC Court of Appeals (1997) Filed an Amicus Brief was in support of a court issuing a protection order prohibiting an abusive husband from reporting his wife to government officials including (INS). (Piper Marbury Rudnick & Wolfe, Pro Bono)

Family-based practice BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Sep 26, 2023

Harrison v. Harrison

Harrison v. Harrison, Kentucky, Fayette Circuit Court 3rd Division (2002) Amicus Brief explaining misuse of protection orders to penalize victims and discourage them from seeking legal relief, “mutual” protection orders as contrary to public policy, and the safety of DV victims as directly related to batterer responsibility enforced in the legal system. (Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Pro Bono)

Family-based practice Court of appeals Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Sep 26, 2023

Meredith v. Muriel K&L Gates

Meredith v. Muriel, Supreme Court of the State of Washington, (2009). Submitted two amicus briefs one on behalf of Legal Momentum and a second on behalf of the National Network to End Violence Against Immigrant Women in a case in which an abuser appealed the issuance of a protection order containing a prohibition against the abuser communicating with the Department of Homeland Security regarding his wife. One brief (K & L Gates, Pro Bono) provided social science documentation of the harm to vict

Family-based practice BIA Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory May 8, 2023

Unofficial Notes from USCIS Stakeholder Call on VAWA, U, and T Issues (May 8, 2023)

%PDF-1.6 %���� 405 0 obj <> endobj 438 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[ ]/Index[405 50]/Info 404 0 R/Length 145/Prev 855292/Root 406 0 R/Size 455/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``~ " �H�_ �E �����v`RLBt)�UN����X�c0 FWwI� ! ��/,�lW ����< R�+X�D���H�,'�d��ct�g��V R�H~SIa`bd`T��͠2�����@��5�� endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 454 0 obj <>stream h�b```b``fg`e``M`a@�6 �x�$��T�����0���.���V ������1|p``� !Z�<�����he�8���g�_�� &>����'�,m�趸����4�G:��[���14w��y�Ϣ

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Apr 1, 2023

ASISTA Notes from USCIS CAM Stakeholder Engagement & Highlights from April 2023 Expansion (April 2023)

%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 7 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> stream x�콇[��?����}[�B�ı5�r ZVV��i�C�æ��Bi˦@ �my2 -e #�S�C{x$�$$d��a��y �+� q"�vrz)�t�|����3c� �"� �"� �"� �"� �"� �"� �"� �"� SQ8�1�&Naf��}F�"HX�����*M�����@W�"��k;g\�<�w�o%#�|�9��eY�A&7����3�]3f�&�D� V��X�6�*#������t+��g.���N�����tiL�ܔp�� ��������v'�D�S ��7ɢ ����z��>�w�!�&�p�S��'|�9cA_�12�I�C`%� �"ԛ� �"��1󲾙��Y�l�1�|.��>�J�:Ey� �u�;d�;E�;� `#��Jc��^�y���}<��� �/�ʐ

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF