BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
918 resources 24 sources 848 direct files
Common starting points
Immigration court deadline 624 Asylum merits package 95 Motions, stays, and pretermission 139 Bond, detention, and habeas 85 BIA, PFR, and federal court 466 USCIS and AAO appeals 214 Crim-imm screening 158 VAWA, U, T, and survivor relief 197
Workflow: Immigration court deadline Clear

Results

Showing 217-228 of 624 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
ASISTA Practice advisory Jul 2, 2021

Albence Practice Advisory (Updated 6/21/2021): Stay Extended through July 2, 2021

%PDF-1.6 %���� 168 0 obj <> endobj 191 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[ ]/Index[168 45]/Info 167 0 R/Length 110/Prev 447811/Root 169 0 R/Size 213/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``� � �i5�d��;����&�@$cX�U0 ��f���Q`2DI�H [ �Xx���f�H�C ��(�� >�� � s�K�J�g` x `��X endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 212 0 obj <>stream h�b```�V�# B  �� ea���$��,�`��͒aN���O���JgX'0ɹ�o```�aҌ�b��}�� �� �>Lp˞'�q���ڧ�g?� ��̸.��~�}�5���EK���h`�``�h`��Pi���" l����Y� ,����(˂��b`pd�� ϰ�A�

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jun 30, 2021

Strategies and Considerations in the Wake of Niz-Chavez v. Garland

In Niz-Chavez v. Garland , 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021), the Supreme Court held that a Notice to Appear must convey the time and place of the hearing in a single document in order to trigger the stop-time rule in cancellation of removal cases, and that a subsequently-issued hearing notice does not stop time if the Notice to Appear did not include the required information. The rationale underlying the Court’s decision, however, more broadly affects both ongoing and closed cases initiated by defective N

Removal defense Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Jun 22, 2021

Practice Advisory: Overview of Borden v. United States for Immigration Counsel (June 22, 2021) (by IDP, NIP-NLG, and NILA)

^��ľ�{��� )VYu������5&�lV.V�# ���j�W�h��ꮭ��4#陁�큖 F\�$�$��!N�Y��� )�|(�S��j�T?��x���T*U$�Ō����w��K8�������>�q���qy]>�F�'Rb2A+�'�ᕖ��BZ*�%HJl)�@��=;w�e�F���Q��Ξ�@�uQ���rZ9� �v' [ v $H�l�ܝMin���z�Ȳ�>�k� KŒ@��}W��>47�����׬͖&:O� ��__[�7k ��$i�m~�Z����*%�h�0 3�B�[�3p������=�Ox^u����� �v�V�5U��_ujo3���g�����Q�8�]Jmo�v^k�F�Vq���� u�� v�q�n�RKk��"Y8Kk4⫙� ��^\#v��lm���)�S-� �i���Ka�K��ip6ʋ�i&��CF�� h�]��d ��V��Q�sCq��X��fk!�*�s��L�{�V�d���5�Y oHό��&�1��Hk6%C� �LM����'���U;u�pM

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jun 21, 2021

Advocating for Clients in Removal Proceedings Using the OPLA Prosecutorial Discretion Memo

ICE enforcement priorities have changed under the Biden administration , signaling a return to the use of prosecutorial discretion. On May 27, 2021, the ICE Principal Legal Advisor issued guidance for OPLA attorneys about how and when to exercise prosecutorial discretion during various stages of removal proceedings. EOIR subsequently issued its own memo discussing EOIR policies related to the enforcement priorities. Building upon our previous practice advisory, Advocating for Clients under the B

Removal defense Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ASISTA Practice advisory Jun 11, 2021

Updated Practice Alert Regarding Certain U and T After-Acquired Cases (June 11, 2021)

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 196 0 R/ViewerPreferences 197 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/Font<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 23 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��\�s�F��*�S�夔3/`�R���%�����֩T��KXR�F�%�q����a�!6 m��E�虞~�����w��u:ٰ��>�٤�y6e��_.W��_>����l����2?�����g�4���`o޽e��~�l�>=�lvz��N�" Ċ)-�W��.;=�����ӓ0�?� Y�������'o.OOο�� T��� ����">���£

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Jun 3, 2021

Practice Advisory: “Realistic Probability” in Immigration Categorical Approach Cases (June 3, 2021) (by IDP and NIP-NLG)

�[��m"1���e<�܊_��Ռ�;x;W��;{���� G�1M�$0�͏}1�&Uv�  PA#љeb�P���]� �fM����ct���g���9�O#9�,(�Y�'��$kp��}S�Eaw�< �-���2�Z�,�u�ꆵ�*��-�XPV�Z��§�QPg�d��:���= OX�e]�Mg��n�YW�;��c��=1`�.�3N�׵����*Q ��Lܞ�/5�'MMĖ�V � ����� ׵'\�ڂ���q(��2[gO�mYu���>�]��/�%�V�A#���Ϊ8���Ň�o�1|�u�#'L<�^���JM�Ժ�y����Zz�촤+Zu�lw�w�[=y,��2Z�Տ���t[��`+�L�6���`�-� ^�������AfBg�۵� ��P�i�{�_���\�'k�=�vU�!y*A���2�!_��AÒ;�� �(:Z��^��0v�c�}l ثe��_����'6�r�/,$zd�Z�"B���k�'hyH ��:��}�&�

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
National Immigration Project Practice advisory May 31, 2021

Practice Alert Update: Proposed Criminal Bars to Asylum - Current Status of Regulations Governing Eligibility for Asylum and (c)(8) EAD

On July 9, 2020, NIPNLG published a Practice Alert examining the intersection of the criminal bars proposed in those regulations. In the latter half of 2020, final versions of all three proposed rules were issued, and were subsequently challenged in litigation before their effective dates. This Practice Alert provides an update on the current status of the rules as they apply to asylum seekers with criminal contacts in light of the litigation developments. As these proceedings are ongoing, this

Asylum Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
NIWAP Library Amicus brief May 12, 2021

Petition for asylum was granted and remand for further proceedings by Circuit Judge Graber and Judge Richard A. Paez (04/05/21)

In this opinion the 9th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals ruled that Rodrigues Tornes is eligible for gender based asylum because her domestic abusers (both her former husband and later another former intimate partner) persecuted her for her feminist opinions and views on her rights as a woman. In this case issued after both “Matter of A-B- I” and “Matter of A-B- II the 9th Circuit federal court of appeals ruled that a woman who was persecuted by domestic abusers because of a feminist political o

Asylum Removal defense BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
National Immigration Project Practice advisory May 7, 2021

Practice Advisory: Settling FTCA Litigation for Immigration Relief

This practice advisory discusses strategies for obtaining immigration relief as part of a settlement agreement with the government to resolve a lawsuit for damages brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) based on torts committed by agents of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and/or U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record