BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Workflow: BIA, PFR, and federal court Clear

Results

Showing 169-180 of 447 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Sample brief Mar 16, 2021

TPS for Venezuela: An Overview

The Biden administration announced the designation of Venezuela for TPS, effective March 9, 2021 through September 9, 2022. TPS provides protection from removal, work authorization, and the option to request permission to travel abroad. The 180-day registration period is currently open through September 5, 2021. This advisory provides an overview of the requirements and application process for TPS for Venezuela. It also includes a brief summary of Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) for Venezuela

Removal defense Special immigrant Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Feb 22, 2021

Mandamus and APA Delay Cases: Avoiding Dismissal and Proving the Case

This Practice Advisory provides basic information about filing an immigration-related delay action in federal district court under both the Mandamus Act and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). It discusses the required elements of a successful mandamus and APA actions as well as jurisdictional concerns that may arise.

Federal court Evidence and procedure Federal district court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Feb 11, 2021

ASISTA Practice Alert Regarding Certain U Visa "After-Acquired Spouse" Cases (February 11, 2021

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 175 0 R/ViewerPreferences 176 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/Font<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 21 0 R 24 0 R 25 0 R 26 0 R 27 0 R 28 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x�� is���g� 0�R�c���kfǝ=���i�u���� Y�ѵEU�n�_�� ��e�dV�I�xx����fw3�ޱW�.^�v����vq���}q��^^�4��_�v�����~��KY����%{��-���S�n��'�ݞ�$a���q$LE2�+��Y������俧'a�,d1|&�������NO�\��\�

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Nov 23, 2020

New Practice Advisory: Insight into USCIS's Application of the "No-Blanks" Policy to U-Visa Petitions (November 23, 2020)

The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA), ASISTA and the Domestic Violence Project (DVP) of the Urban Justice Center have published a new practice advisory based on new USCIS documentation obtained by FOIA litigation brought by Cleary Gottlieb on behalf of DVP.

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Nov 20, 2020

Practice Alert: Protecting the Materiality Requirement in False Citizenship Claim Cases Outside the Eleventh Circuit

This Practice Alert addresses Patel ’s second holding: that false claims to U.S. citizenship render noncitizens removable even if the claim had no possible impact on the decision or application at issue—that is, even if the false citizenship claim is immaterial.

Naturalization Court of appeals Direct PDF
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Nov 20, 2020

Practice Tip: The Government Answered a Complaint Alleging Administrative Procedure Act Violations – Now What?

This practice tip responds to a frequent question from attorneys new to federal court litigation who filed a lawsuit claiming the government violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) — such as a complaint challenging an employment-based immigration petition denial : “I just received the government’s answer. Now what ?” It explains next steps: the government’s filing of the certified administrative record followed by the parties moving for summary judgment. The practice tip also explains ho

Employment Federal court Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Oct 2, 2020

USCIS Fee Rule Enjoined September 29, 2020

Alert : On September 29, 2020 the Fee Rule was enjoined nation-wide in its entirety by a District court in the Northern District of California, ILRC et al. v. Chad F. Wolf, et al . (ND California) (Case 4:20-cv-05883-JSW) (Sept. 29, 2020).

Federal court USCIS Federal district court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Sep 1, 2020

ASISTA Practice Pointer: Requesting Congressional Liaison Assistance (September 2020)

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 212 0 R/ViewerPreferences 213 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 21 0 R 29 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��\Yo�H~7���Gk0��M6�A��-�3dvg�b�2-[�ؒ#J�x��]�m � �G �U��_ Lr��q�J޽;�m��<�N>�W���b5�N���Y��� K3�!4ɒ��V M6�Ã/?$�Ã��Ã� ��\� �(KH��YJo��K. x��?W�m�Ln�]��~><��Q2�Or����{>�?���͒ĥ��H]V�$OXS�T'iڟ:�

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Aug 31, 2020

ASISTA Practice Pointer: FOIA Requests to DHS in Survivor-Based Cases (August 31, 2020)

�5-��M��� �ĝ�1�N 3�w����>1� �S9�e��v[�'���3�K7���Pz�T���%NM;� 3[�u����cF%V���f�Fp�zm̞�~�}�H�˒���U�XO��ǦU ��ش�t����w�A���L�c��>��D�Uڱ�V ���63��uZ���y�5�R9t:7���W�) �zR��z����H俑ء���q����V;H� w W���@`��`�-���d �Us�z���x��xl�M p�f��[ Z`[No:�R���+4��z9 ��[C1��}[� �q���M�� ��a�D������T^�`8��UT�6��L�V�R �b����K ���.�e���5������q�u�J�ՒB˗�� MEX����%���7|Nı��6|��d-��{���\&_�F���a#*�V�p���93 �er8�}"������Ż�� � �͹|N �GbyNl/��:���+�r���7�sȘ�\J��=�%~�o%��c ��� �(�ܻ���r��- �Έ�oat

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Aug 14, 2020

Requesting Attorneys’ Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act

The Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) authorizes payment by the government of attorneys’ fees and costs for successful federal court litigation against the government. A successful litigant who establishes eligibility under EAJA is entitled to a fee award for litigating both the case and the fee motion. Fees and costs under EAJA are assessed without regard to whether or how much money, if any, the client actually paid his or her attorney. As such, attorneys who take cases on a pro bono or “low

Federal court Cross-forum Direct PDF
ACLU Practice advisory Jul 29, 2020

Practice Advisory: Bond Hearings in Baltimore Immigration Court Under Dubon Miranda V. Barr

Practice Advisory: Bond Hearings in Baltimore Immigration Court Under Dubon Miranda V. Barr | American Civil Liberties Union Skip navigation document Practice Advisory: Bond Hearings in Baltimore Immigration Court Under Dubon Miranda V. Barr Document Date: July 29, 2020 Download document Download document Skip to PDF content

Detention / bond Federal court Removal defense Immigration court Federal district court Direct PDF