Practice Alert: In Mathis v. United States , Supreme Court Reaffirms and Bolsters Strict Application of the Categorical Approach
%PDF-1.5 %���� 1 0 obj <>>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��X]s�J}OU�C?�V22� �R�"��7����[�@�D�s��-ﯿ�D@0&Q�O��i�4������-��ps;���lpǁ ���8���4,f� �����3^����ٯ �����l��0zT�y�g9s����D �3N1��H�q�yDp&NQ�l��uj �d �+ �i�Z�,�b8����7���Бw?�� Φ˙#+�U �4 �� wp:H���OM,�BX;��%�ܰ�"�r�*�t���s�l�j ��_��=B�op'Z�M�x-"�&�
Why it matters
Useful as a practitioner-oriented overview from Immigrant Defense Project on Crimes; review the source material for the most current authority and procedure.
Topics
Crimes and categorical approach
Removal defense
Workflows
Immigration court deadline
BIA, PFR, and federal court
Crim-imm screening
Forums
Immigration court
BIA
Court of appeals
Jurisdictions
National