HammondLaw

HammondLaw Immigration Research Database

Practice Advisories & Brief Bank

Public immigration practice advisories, sample briefs, template motions, amicus briefs, and government guidance, organized in one searchable index and linked to the original host.

212 resources 12 sources 19 topics 177 direct PDFs

Filters

Clear
Type: Practice advisory Clear Topic: Evidence and procedure Clear

Results

Showing 1-12 of 23 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
Resource Source Topics Date Links

Policy Alert: Policy Manual Updates to 8 USC § 1367 Confidentiality Protections

Practice advisory

Breaks down USCIS policy-manual updates on 8 U.S.C. 1367 confidentiality protections and highlights what practitioners should watch in sensitive filings.

Why it matters: Important for survivor-based practice because confidentiality mistakes can create immediate and serious client risk.

ASISTA National
VAWA / U / T Evidence and procedure USCIS Cross-forum
Feb 3, 2026

Considerations in Asylum Claims for Transgender People

Practice advisory

Practice advisory on framing transgender asylum claims in the current policy environment, with attention to protected grounds, evidentiary development, and country-conditions proof.

Why it matters: Worth opening early in any trans-asylum case because it helps structure the theory of harm and the supporting record before drafting begins.

Immigration Equality National Direct PDF available
Asylum Withholding / CAT Evidence and procedure USCIS Immigration court BIA
Jun 2, 2025

Pretermission Web Advisory for Pro Bono Attorneys

Practice advisory

Overview of recent EOIR policy changes allowing dismissal or pretermission of some defensive asylum applications without a hearing, with guidance for practitioners representing people in removal proceedings.

Why it matters: Strong triage piece when an asylum case may be screened out on procedural grounds before testimony or full merits development.

Immigration Equality National Direct PDF available
Asylum Removal defense Evidence and procedure Immigration court BIA
Jun 1, 2025

ASISTA Practice Alert: VAWA Self-Petitioner Interviews at USCIS Field Offices

Practice advisory

Practice alert on USCIS interviews for VAWA self-petitioners, including rollout details and practitioner reporting requests tied to field-office implementation.

Why it matters: Helpful when preparing clients for a changing interview practice that can materially affect how the case is documented and explained.

ASISTA National
VAWA / U / T Evidence and procedure USCIS
Feb 17, 2025

Seeking Stays of Removal

Practice advisory

A stay of removal prevents the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from deporting a noncitizen from the United States while they continue to challenge their removal order or pursue an immigration benefit or humanitarian protection. This practice advisory discusses the law, procedure, and practical tips for seeking a stay of removal from DHS, immigration judges, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the U.S. courts of appeals.

Why it matters: Useful as a practitioner-oriented overview from American Immigration Council on Removal Defense; review the source material for the most current authority and procedure.

American Immigration Council National Direct PDF available
Removal defense BIA appeals Evidence and procedure Immigration court BIA
Jan 17, 2025

Practice Alert: Padilla v. ICE and Delays in Credible Fear Interviews

Practice advisory

This practice advisory discusses the law, procedure, and practical tips for seeking a stay of removal from DHS, immigration judges, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the U.S. courts of appeals.

Why it matters: Useful as a practitioner-oriented overview from American Immigration Council on Removal Defense; review the source material for the most current authority and procedure.

American Immigration Council National Direct PDF available
Removal defense BIA appeals Evidence and procedure Immigration court BIA
Jan 8, 2024

Practice Tip: Opposing a Motion to Dismiss Asserting the Consular Nonreviewability Doctrine in Agency Delay Cases

Practice advisory

Practitioners who challenge delays in visa processing often face a motion to dismiss based on the consular nonreviewability doctrine. This practice tip examines the scope of the doctrine. It provides arguments, with supporting documentation, to oppose common situations that the government claims are final, nonreviewable decisions. It also discusses the advantages of an Administrative Procedure Act cause of action and offers considerations for demonstrating unreasonable delay. The practice tip al

Why it matters: Useful as a practitioner-oriented overview from American Immigration Council on Removal Defense; review the source material for the most current authority and procedure.

American Immigration Council National Direct PDF available
Removal defense Consular practice Evidence and procedure Consular processing
Dec 16, 2022

Nightingale v. USCIS and FOIA Requests for Immigration Case Files (A-Files)

Practice advisory

This practice advisory explains 1) the ways to submit a FOIA request for a client’s immigration records, or A-File, 2) provides suggestions for avoiding agency rejections of the requests, and 3) identifies issues related to the Nightingale injunction that class counsel are monitoring.

Why it matters: Useful as a practitioner-oriented overview from American Immigration Council on Evidence / Procedure; review the source material for the most current authority and procedure.

American Immigration Council National Direct PDF available
Evidence and procedure USCIS
Dec 15, 2022

Immigration Lawsuits and the APA: The Basics of a District Court Action

Practice advisory

This Practice Advisory discusses the primary issues involved in a suit brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to challenge an unlawful agency action. The Advisory provides examples of how these issues have been decided in immigration cases and arguments that can be made to meet the various procedural requirements for an APA action.

Why it matters: Useful as a practitioner-oriented overview from American Immigration Council on Federal Court; review the source material for the most current authority and procedure.

American Immigration Council National Direct PDF available
Federal court Evidence and procedure Federal district court
Oct 5, 2021

Mandamus and APA Delay Cases: Avoiding Dismissal and Proving the Case

Practice advisory

This Practice Advisory provides basic information about filing an immigration-related delay action in federal district court under both the Mandamus Act and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). It discusses the required elements of a successful mandamus and APA actions as well as jurisdictional concerns that may arise.

Why it matters: Useful as a practitioner-oriented overview from American Immigration Council on Federal Court; review the source material for the most current authority and procedure.

American Immigration Council National Direct PDF available
Federal court Evidence and procedure Federal district court
Feb 22, 2021

Practice Tip: The Government Answered a Complaint Alleging Administrative Procedure Act Violations – Now What?

Practice advisory

This practice tip responds to a frequent question from attorneys new to federal court litigation who filed a lawsuit claiming the government violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) — such as a complaint challenging an employment-based immigration petition denial : “I just received the government’s answer. Now what ?” It explains next steps: the government’s filing of the certified administrative record followed by the parties moving for summary judgment. The practice tip also explains ho

Why it matters: Useful as a practitioner-oriented overview from American Immigration Council on Employment; review the source material for the most current authority and procedure.

American Immigration Council National Direct PDF available
Employment Federal court Evidence and procedure Cross-forum
Nov 20, 2020

Administrative Closure Post -Castro-Tum

Practice advisory

This practice advisory provides a brief overview of administrative closure and explains the impact of that decision on the future availability of administrative closure, as well as on cases that are currently administratively closed. The advisory suggests arguments challenging Matter of Castro-Tum that noncitizens may consider making in support of administrative closure of their cases. Finally, it discusses alternative mechanisms to dispose of or hold in abeyance proceedings in appropriate cases

Why it matters: Useful as a practitioner-oriented overview from American Immigration Council on Evidence / Procedure; review the source material for the most current authority and procedure.

American Immigration Council National Direct PDF available
Evidence and procedure Cross-forum
Oct 22, 2019