BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Workflow: Immigration court deadline Clear

Results

Showing 85-96 of 606 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
ASISTA Practice advisory Jun 1, 2024

ASISTA Practice Advisory: Establishing Employment Authorization for T and U Nonimmigrants Without an EAD Card (Updated in June 2024)

%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> stream x�}��J�`� kA�A� \��h���X\[�V�4M�؟�������&.ހ�e(��%���o$����{x�/�@$�*�N�s˥�Q� S�L��eZ}����K�}^�'7��v���!y�.�'��V��>�����s<���^�(���F�>–���7�V�=���f���WtV�%J��-�جS�#LQ�"��'IB� EN��Py�zfISP�Y��H)����� ���@� &/C�~�{ �e�6�����1]shE�H� ��0W��'�9�]�Y�?����bM��4 �?��K� endstream endobj 9 0 obj <> stream x��w|W�>����|~ﻛ۪.�l����.� )[rU�$���!��q�� �6@$!ͽ�T�Ir��zs�Er�w�r�E6�᠏,͌�43�=��s

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Jun 1, 2024

ASISTA Practice Advisory: Establishing Employment Authorization for T and U Nonimmigrants Without an EAD Card (Updated in June 2024)

%PDF-1.4 %���� 1 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <> endobj 4 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> stream x�c``<��, �y%EA�N �Q �� �� p��o� j/��Q� p��'�@,S� h$�-�a+��I� �]^RPd{��E!A�@v �����NBb'�Է��6�9��w3��C�2 C���,�200O@�%�d`���� q !����� h��1DX$%��X��)-����r�H� \Ѱ���&�y2 � �@�ΐÐ �d�cHf���  ��[=� endstream endobj 9 0 obj <> stream x�콅_���?����ϱ�XQ�9�s�c�"5�Q*�������t��݁I��K�P� %������fcl�6�� χǃcq�����.��;up��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p��� 8p�

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Jun 1, 2024

ASISTA Practice Advisory: Reinstatement of Removal and Immigrant Survivors (June 2024)

%PDF-1.3 %��������� 3 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 7773 >> stream x�]i� ���^��Hq8=����:l�D�u����?l0��7D�ZZ��2 P�TuS��Nw���e"�@U�����gy��/u����r�~y�Kձ��w�a���ܔ�ߔ�/��7ğ���ۦ�������˦�˗?��G7���*_�y���� ʩ�����˿���?f� �n�� ڕ~�n�����4 �j����� /�=s���������XOcY�� 7��=`�B��5c_N�Ŕ�cU #�#�]; ����zX�������p{x���r�?�)��p��˃����n�!]U ^�ܔ����]w�7���|� ݗ;G��M���� X�A@*�w�=f~ ��T׭g^L���2��P�Q=#"�I�?k���oD�]|H"��H���D{�^t���@3��_�d�9R�z�+ �� \+���a�,��M_��|���������q����?� ��0�D��

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Amicus brief May 2, 2024

Wilkinson v. Garland (September 2023) US Supreme Court.

NIWAP participated in an amicus brief on writ of certiorari to the US Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit to ensure that courts review BIA hardship determinations for immigrant victims of domestic violence seeking cancellation of removal under VAWA. SCOTUS ruled in favor of Wilkinson, holding that the application of the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship standard to an established set of facts is a mixed question of law and fact that is reviewable under 1252(a)(2)(D). This ruling gives

Removal defense VAWA / U / T BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice manual Apr 26, 2024

Guidance for SIJS State Court Predicate Orders in California- What You Need to Know in 2024

This updated guidance, written with our partners Immigrant Legal Defense (ILD), International Rescue Committee (IRC), and Legal Services for Children (LSC), includes recommendations for what information to include in state court predicate orders for special immigrant juvenile status (SIJS) in California. It incorporates guidance from the 2022 SIJS regulations as well as the USCIS Policy Manual, and includes helpful citations to California law. It also includes sample predicate orders from family

Family-based practice Special immigrant Children and SIJS USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Resource directory Apr 25, 2024

Employment and Immigrants

Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (December 10 2001) Supreme Court of the United States. National Immigrant Law Center (NILC) and others, represented by National Employment Law Project, submitted this amicus brief supporting the importance of back pay remedies when labor laws are violated including relief for undocumented workers. Second amicus brief filed regarding a Government of Mexico requested advisory opinion from the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (20

Employment Cross-forum
NIWAP Library Resource directory Apr 25, 2024

Federal Preemption in Immigration Law

Friendly House Et Al., V. Michael B. Whiting Et Al ., (June 11, 2010) United States District Court Arizona. Legal Momentum, recruited by the ACLU, MALDEF, The National Immigration Law Center, and the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (represented by Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips) to organize a brief articulating immigrant women’s perspective amicus in support of plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction to stop implementation of key portions of Arizona’s anti-immigrant legislation SB 1070

Removal defense Federal court Federal district court
NIWAP Library Resource directory Apr 25, 2024

Gender-Based Asylum

Vallabhaneni (September 27 2001) Board of Immigration Appeals. NOW Legal Defense Fund and others filed this amicus in support of the appeal by Aruna C. Vallabhaneni of the decision of the Immigration Judge denying her application for political asylum despite an undisputed record of years of severe domestic violence and her inability to obtain protection from the government of India. The record before the judge established that Ms. Vallabhaneni was persecuted in the past and that she has a well-f

Asylum BIA appeals Immigration court BIA
NIWAP Library Resource directory Apr 25, 2024

Special Immigrant Juvenile Status

Guardianship of S.H.R. v. Jesus Rivas (March 21, 2022; August 15, 2022) Supreme Court of California. NIWAP, represented by Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, filed an amicus brief in the Supreme Court of California in a case in which the Court of Appeals wrongly denied an SIJS eligible child SIJS predicate findings. The amicus brief detailed the legislative and regulatory history of Special Immigrant Juvenile Status and discussed how the approach taken by the Court of Appeals directly contradicts this

BIA appeals Federal court Special immigrant Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Resource directory Apr 25, 2024

Trauma, Testimony, and Adult Victims

Gabriel Perez Cruz v. Barr , (July 2 2020) U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit. NIWAP assisted the Family Violence Appellate Project in California in developing, securing social science support for and national sign ons from 16 organizations nationally for this 9th Circuit Amicus Brief in which we were represented by Haney and Boone LLP. The brief discussed the mental health impact of domestic violence and coercive control in abusive relationships and perpetrators who coerce their victims into com

Removal defense Family-based practice BIA appeals BIA Court of appeals
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Apr 17, 2024

Breaking Down the Visa Bulletin: What SIJS Advocates Need To Know

Until Congress fixes the SIJS visa backlog, SIJS youth must wait years before a visa is available for them to seek lawful permanent residence. This resource is intended to help SIJS advocates better understand the system used by the U.S. Department of State to allocate visas. Advocates are critical in helping SIJS youth through this lengthy process, starting with helping SIJS youth understand how the visa system works.

Consular practice Special immigrant Immigration court Consular processing Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Mar 27, 2024

Practice Advisory: Pursuing Private Immigration Relief Legislation in Congress

As Congress continuously fails to pass humane immigration legislation, many noncitizens remain vulnerable to removal from the United States. While this legislative failure affects all noncitizens negatively, Congress’s failure to enact meaningful immigration reform is particularly damaging to noncitizens who are unable to obtain legal status through normal immigration channels—particularly those noncitizens who may present unique cases that involve particularly sympathetic factors. These nonciti

Removal defense Cross-forum Direct PDF