BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Common starting points
Immigration court deadline 606 Asylum merits package 93 Motions, stays, and pretermission 133 Bond, detention, and habeas 79 BIA, PFR, and federal court 447 USCIS and AAO appeals 209 Crim-imm screening 151 VAWA, U, T, and survivor relief 190
Topic: Removal defense Clear Workflow: Immigration court deadline Clear

Results

Showing 85-96 of 233 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jun 6, 2022

VAWA Self-Petition Policy Updates (June 2022)

On February 10, 2022, USCIS released several VAWA Self-Petition policy changes. The changes include the nationwide implementation of two circuit court decisions and changes in USCIS’s interpretation of the joint residence requirement for VAWA Self-Petitioners. This practice advisory contains short summaries of USCIS’s VAWA Self-Petition policy changes.

Removal defense VAWA / U / T USCIS Court of appeals Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Mar 29, 2022

Adjustment of Status Through Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) (June 2022)

This advisory gives an overview of the SIJS-based adjustment of status process. It will give step-by-step guidance for both the affirmative process, for young people who are not in removal proceedings, and for the defensive process, for young people who are in removal proceedings before the Executive Office for Immigration Review.

Removal defense Adjustment of status Special immigrant Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Mar 25, 2022

2022 Case Update: Domestic Violence Deportation Ground

The domestic violence deportation ground at INA § 237(a)(2)(E) sets out four bases for deportation: conviction of a crime of domestic violence, a crime of stalking, or a crime of child abuse, neglect, or abandonment, or being the subject of a judicial finding of violation of a domestic violence stay-away order. Coming within one of these grounds also can be a bar to cancellation of removal for non-permanent residents or DACA.

Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Children and SIJS Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Feb 11, 2022

How to Recapture/Retain and Utilize Priority Dates

This practice advisory contains numerous practical examples to assist in understanding how to recapture and retain priority dates in the family immigration context. It includes discussions and examples of how this concept intersects with other provisions of law, such as the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA), and adjustment of status under § 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). A brief discussion and summary of the utilization of cross-chargeability of priority dates is also incl

Removal defense Family-based practice Adjustment of status Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Feb 8, 2022

Matter of Laparra

In Matter of Laparra , 28 I&N Dec. 425 (BIA 2022), the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rejected notice-based arguments for rescinding and reopening an in absentia order when the government serves the respondent with a Notice to Appear (NTA) lacking information about a hearing’s time and place as required by Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) section 239(a)(1). This practice alert provides brief background on the case law relevant to Laparra , describes the Laparra decision and its implicat

Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider BIA appeals BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Feb 8, 2022

Practice Alert: Matter of Laparra

In Matter of Laparra , 28 I&N Dec. 425 (BIA 2022), the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rejected notice-based arguments for rescinding and reopening an in absentia order when the government serves the respondent with a Notice to Appear (NTA) lacking information about a hearing’s time and place as required by Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) section 239(a)(1). This practice alert provides brief background on the case law relevant to Laparra , describes the Laparra decision and its implicat

Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider BIA appeals BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Nov 24, 2021

Practice Advisory: Advocacy Strategies After United States v. Palomar-Santiago

This advisory first reviews the case history and the precedent governing the legal situation Mr. Palomar-Santiago was in when he was charged with illegal re-entry. It then addresses both Mr. Palomar-Santiago’s and the government’s arguments before the Court and the Court’s decision. Finally, the advisory turns to how the Court’s decision affects advocacy strategies for future collateral attacks on removal orders under § 1326(d).

Removal defense Entry and admission Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Oct 5, 2021

How to Use the Categorical Approach Now (2021)

With a few exceptions, immigration authorities must use the “categorical approach” to determine whether a criminal conviction triggers a ground of removal. Expert use of the categorical approach may be the most important defense strategy available to immigrants charged with or convicted of crimes. This Update of our long-running article includes discussion of Pereida v. Wilkinson, 141 S.Ct. 754 (2021).

Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jun 30, 2021

Strategies and Considerations in the Wake of Niz-Chavez v. Garland

In Niz-Chavez v. Garland , 141 S. Ct. 1474 (2021), the Supreme Court held that a Notice to Appear must convey the time and place of the hearing in a single document in order to trigger the stop-time rule in cancellation of removal cases, and that a subsequently-issued hearing notice does not stop time if the Notice to Appear did not include the required information. The rationale underlying the Court’s decision, however, more broadly affects both ongoing and closed cases initiated by defective N

Removal defense Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Jun 22, 2021

Practice Advisory: Overview of Borden v. United States for Immigration Counsel (June 22, 2021) (by IDP, NIP-NLG, and NILA)

^��ľ�{��� )VYu������5&�lV.V�# ���j�W�h��ꮭ��4#陁�큖 F\�$�$��!N�Y��� )�|(�S��j�T?��x���T*U$�Ō����w��K8�������>�q���qy]>�F�'Rb2A+�'�ᕖ��BZ*�%HJl)�@��=;w�e�F���Q��Ξ�@�uQ���rZ9� �v' [ v $H�l�ܝMin���z�Ȳ�>�k� KŒ@��}W��>47�����׬͖&:O� ��__[�7k ��$i�m~�Z����*%�h�0 3�B�[�3p������=�Ox^u����� �v�V�5U��_ujo3���g�����Q�8�]Jmo�v^k�F�Vq���� u�� v�q�n�RKk��"Y8Kk4⫙� ��^\#v��lm���)�S-� �i���Ka�K��ip6ʋ�i&��CF�� h�]��d ��V��Q�sCq��X��fk!�*�s��L�{�V�d���5�Y oHό��&�1��Hk6%C� �LM����'���U;u�pM

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record