BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Topic: Removal defense Clear

Results

Showing 61-72 of 233 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Oct 2, 2023

Esteban Cabezas

Esteban Cabezas is an appeal to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office (2010) of a denial of a VAWA self-petition by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Vermont Service Center. This case raises important issues about the any credible evidence standard to be applied in VAWA self-petitioning cases and on immigration related abuse and the role this abuse plays as part of a pattern of extreme cruelty. (Andrew Taylor, Pro Bono)

Removal defense VAWA / U / T BIA Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Oct 2, 2023

Kewan

Kewan, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (2005). Amicus brief discussing research data and the dynamics of domestic violence against male victims and VAWA’s gender neutrality offering protection to both male and female victims. (Northwest Immigrant Rights Project)

Removal defense VAWA / U / T BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Oct 2, 2023

Leiva-Mendoza v. Holder

Leiva-Mendoza v. Holder, United States Court Of Appeals For The 8th Circuit (April 2 2011) discusses how a child’s witnessing of serious domestic violence perpetrated against their parent is a basis for granting VAWA cancellation of removal to children who witness domestic violence perpetrated against their parent even in cases in which the children have not themselves been abused. This amicus brief provided the court with the relevant research data on harm to children of witnessing abuse in the

Removal defense VAWA / U / T BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Sep 13, 2023

Ramirez-Avila

Ramirez-Avila, Board of Immigration Appeals (2007). Amicus brief discussing the Violence Against Women Act’s lesser extreme hardship standard and the approach to be taken in VAWA cancellation of removal cases with regard to good moral character. (Arnold and Porter, Pro Bono).

Removal defense VAWA / U / T BIA Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Sep 13, 2023

Sanchez v. Gonzalez

Sanchez v. Gonzalez, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit (2006). Amicus brief discussing the Violence Against Women Act’s legislative history and purpose and the special motion to reopen provisions designed for immigrant victims filing VAWA cancellation of removal cases. The trial court and BIA failed to offer Sanchez access to VAWA’s motion to reopen provisions. Additionally, Sanchez’ trial counsel was unfamiliar with VAWA’s special rules and provided Ms. Sanchez with ineffective assistan

Removal defense VAWA / U / T BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Resource directory Sep 13, 2023

Violence Against Women Act-VAWA Self-Petitions, Suspension of Deportation and Cancellation of Removal

Esteban Cabezas (2010) Appeal to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office. Amicus submitted by Legal Momentum, National Network to End Violence Against Immigrant Women, and represented by Andrew Taylor, of a denial of a VAWA self-petition by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Vermont Service Center. This case raises important issues about the any credible evidence standard to be applied in VAWA self-petitioning cases and on immigra

Removal defense Naturalization BIA appeals BIA Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Aug 18, 2023

Practice Advisory: Motions to Reopen Migrant Protection Protocols Removal Orders

(Updated Dec. 27, 2023) This practice advisory, authored by the National Immigration Project and the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, offers a comprehensive review of strategies for reopening cases that were denied under the Migrant Protection Protocols ("MPP"), including equitable tolling arguments, the substantive standards for reopening in absentia and non-in absentia removal orders, and tips for advocating for clients who were in MPP. The advisory also discusses the complexities around

Asylum Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider Cross-forum Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Jul 11, 2023

Practice Alert: OIL Accepts Limited Representation Forms for Pro Se Petitioners with Pending PFRs

Recognizing the challenges that pro se noncitizens face in navigating options for resolving petitions for review (PFRs) through negotiations with government attorneys from the Department of Justice’s Office of Immigration Litigation (OIL), OIL has recently agreed to accept limited representation forms from attorneys who have not entered an appearance in the PFR but who are able to provide limited representation for the purpose of negotiating resolutions of a PFR, including through requests for p

Removal defense Cross-forum Direct PDF
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jun 20, 2023

A Step-by-Step Guide to Filing a FOIA Lawsuit

This Practice Advisory provides immigration practitioners with step-by-step instructions a bout how to file a laws uit under the Freedom of Information Act. The Advisory explains the preliminary steps that need to be completed before filing the lawsuit, the appropriate parties in a FOIA case, the proper venue for filing, the types of claims litigants may bring, how to file the complaint and supporting documents, and what to expect after the law suit is filed . Additionally, the Advisory contains

Removal defense Federal court Federal district court Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory May 30, 2023

Practice Advisory: Removal Orders Entered Against Special Immigrant Juveniles Harmed by the State Department’s Illegal Action

This practice alert offers strategies for practitioners representing special immigrant juveniles who received removal orders because they lacked an available visa, and whose “final action date”—the date that determines when they have a visa available—was incorrectly calculated because of the State Department’s error.

Removal defense Consular practice Special immigrant Cross-forum Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Mar 29, 2023

Advising and Screening DACA Recipients for Present and Future Options

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) policy has been fraught with uncertainty in the last couple of years. Despite the many advantages of this program for young people who have grown up in the United States, DACA continues to suffer attacks by conservative entities who argue that DACA was an overreach of executive power, with the most current legal challenge pending in Texas. Because of this, it is important to consider what other long-term options DACA recipients have and what bene

Removal defense Children and SIJS Cross-forum Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Mar 24, 2023

VAWA Cancellation of Removal

Cancellation of removal under the Violence Against Women Act (“VAWA”) is an often overlooked form of relief for noncitizen survivors of abuse who are faced with removal proceedings. Compared with cancellation of removal for nonpermanent residents (“non-LPR cancellation”), VAWA cancellation is usually a more generous, lenient option for many survivors. In addition, unlike spouse self-petitions, there is no deadline to apply for cancellation after a divorce or loss of immigration status by the abu

Removal defense Family-based practice VAWA / U / T Cross-forum Direct PDF