BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Topic: Evidence and procedure Clear Workflow: Immigration court deadline Clear

Results

Showing 37-48 of 239 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Sep 15, 2023

Practice Advisory: Advocating for Prosecutorial Discretion Under the Biden Administration’s Prosecutorial Discretion Guidance

This practice advisory describes the Biden administration’s current prosecutorial discretion policy in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Texas, 143 S. Ct. 1964 (2023), focusing on the 2021 "Mayorkas Memo" and the 2022 "Doyle Memo," both of which were reinstated following the Supreme Court's June 2023 decision. The practice advisory provides tips for practitioners advocating for prosecutorial discretion on behalf of noncitizens with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (

Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Resource directory Sep 13, 2023

Violence Against Women Act-VAWA Self-Petitions, Suspension of Deportation and Cancellation of Removal

Esteban Cabezas (2010) Appeal to the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office. Amicus submitted by Legal Momentum, National Network to End Violence Against Immigrant Women, and represented by Andrew Taylor, of a denial of a VAWA self-petition by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Vermont Service Center. This case raises important issues about the any credible evidence standard to be applied in VAWA self-petitioning cases and on immigra

Removal defense Naturalization BIA appeals BIA Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Aug 14, 2023

Challenging an Immigration Judge's Adverse Credibility Finding with the Board of Immigration Appeals, Part Two

This is the second part of a two-part practice advisory on how to effectively challenge an immigration judge's adverse credibility finding with the Board of Immigration Appeals. The two advisories should be read together, as neither part is complete on its own. This second part of the advisory discusses how to challenge adverse credibility findings based on a witness's demeanor or responsiveness; findings that are based on an immigration judge's speculation and conjecture, particularly regarding

BIA appeals Evidence and procedure Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jun 26, 2023

Challenging an Immigration Judge's Adverse Credibility Finding with the Board of Immigration Appeals, Part One

This is the first part of a two-part practice advisory on how to effectively challenge an immigration judge's adverse credibility finding with the Board of Immigration Appeals. The advisory guides practitioners on what constitutes a proper adverse credibility finding and what to do if the finding is unclear or improper. It then specifically identifies the most common bases for adverse credibility findings, with practical advice on how to challenge each type of finding per current case law.

BIA appeals Evidence and procedure Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Jun 23, 2023

Practice Advisory: United States v. Texas - The Supreme Court’s Decision on Biden’s Enforcement Priorities

On June 23, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a favorable decision in United States v. Texas , 599 U.S. (2023), a case brought by Texas and Louisiana challenging the Biden administration’s immigration enforcement priorities. The Court held that the States lack Article III standing to challenge the priorities. All of the Justices, except Alito, agreed with the outcome. This practice alert breaks down the decision.

Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Mar 20, 2023

How to Analyze a Crim-Imm Case: Four Questions to Identify Case Goals

Immigration and crimes, or “crim-imm,” can be challenging. Both immigration and criminal law are difficult on their own. To do crim-imm work, advocates who are expert in one area must learn at least something about law and procedure in the other. It can be hard to know where to start the analysis.

Crimes and categorical approach Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Mar 2, 2023

Undesignated (Tier III) Terrorist Organization Tracker

In 2001, the USA PATRIOT Act introduced a sweeping definition of "terrorist organization" into the Immigration and Nationality Act. 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(3)(B)(vi)(III). Immigration advocates report that it has resulted in unjust and discriminatory targeting of applicants for immigration benefits-including penalizing applicants for affiliating with U.S.-allied groups. Under this three-part classification system, groups that are considered to be " Tier I " and " Tier II " terrorist organizations ar

Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jan 5, 2023

Introduction to Federal Rulemaking and Public Participation

Federal Rulemaking is one of the most direct ways that the public can participate and shape policies and practices of executive agencies. Federal regulations govern the executive agencies charged with enforcing the United States’ immigration laws and granting immigration benefits to eligible applicants. However, the process of Federal Rulemaking is often misunderstood and public participation in the process is under-utilized. This practice advisory provides an overview of the federal regulatory

Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Dec 16, 2022

Practice Tip: Opposing a Motion to Dismiss Asserting the Consular Nonreviewability Doctrine in Agency Delay Cases

Practitioners who challenge delays in visa processing often face a motion to dismiss based on the consular nonreviewability doctrine. This practice tip examines the scope of the doctrine. It provides arguments, with supporting documentation, to oppose common situations that the government claims are final, nonreviewable decisions. It also discusses the advantages of an Administrative Procedure Act cause of action and offers considerations for demonstrating unreasonable delay. The practice tip al

Removal defense Consular practice Evidence and procedure Consular processing Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Nov 29, 2022

Fact Sheet on Penal Code § 372.5, effective Jan. 1, 2023

This fact sheet describes new Cal. Penal Code 372.5 ( AB 2195 ). As of January 1, 2023, a California defendant who is charged with any of several drug offenses, from infractions to felonies, can ask for the drug charge/s to be dismissed and instead to plead guilty to being a “public nuisance” ( Penal Code § 370 ). Section 372.5 provides that in this circumstance, the public nuisance offense is punishable as an infraction, a misdemeanor, or a “wobbler” offense, depending on the offense level of t

Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
Human Rights First PALA Library Practice manual Sep 25, 2022

Practice Advisories

EOIR manual explaining the procedures for electronic filing through EOIR’s Courts & Appeals System (ECAS). Last updated September 25, 2022.

Asylum Withholding / CAT Evidence and procedure USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF