BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Topic: Asylum Clear

Results

Showing 37-48 of 87 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Aug 18, 2023

Practice Advisory: Motions to Reopen Migrant Protection Protocols Removal Orders

(Updated Dec. 27, 2023) This practice advisory, authored by the National Immigration Project and the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, offers a comprehensive review of strategies for reopening cases that were denied under the Migrant Protection Protocols ("MPP"), including equitable tolling arguments, the substantive standards for reopening in absentia and non-in absentia removal orders, and tips for advocating for clients who were in MPP. The advisory also discusses the complexities around

Asylum Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider Cross-forum Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jun 27, 2023

The Central American Minors (CAM) Program

The Central American Minors program (CAM) is a hybrid refugee and parole program. It benefits minors in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras who have a parent or legal guardian living in the United States under certain forms of immigration status. The program was first introduced in 2014, but was terminated in 2017 under the Trump administration. The Biden administration reinstated the program in 2021 and made enhancements to the program in April 2023. This advisory gives an overview of the CAM

Asylum Detention / bond Children and SIJS Cross-forum Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory May 15, 2023

Practice Advisory: Biden’s Asylum Ban

The Biden Administration recently announced an Asylum Ban for those seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border who have not followed limited “legal pathways” or sought, and been denied, asylum in a third country en route to the border. This Practice Alert gives a preliminary explanation of how this complicated rule is intended to work both at the border and subsequently at merits’ adjudications.

Asylum Cross-forum Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Feb 3, 2023

Enjoined Asylum Regulations "Cheat Sheet"

The first Trump administration published myriad regulations seeking to restrict access to asylum and related protections. Some of these regulations were enjoined through litigation, including Pangea Legal Servs.I v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec. , 501 F. Supp. 3d 792, 827 (N.D. Cal. 2020), a case on which NIPNLG is co-counsel. Most of these lawsuits were held in abeyance during the Biden administration, which stated it was going to undertake rulemaking which, largely, it did not do. Meanwhile, as

Asylum Cross-forum Direct PDF
Human Rights First PALA Library Practice manual Sep 25, 2022

Practice Advisories

EOIR manual explaining the procedures for electronic filing through EOIR’s Courts & Appeals System (ECAS). Last updated September 25, 2022.

Asylum Withholding / CAT Evidence and procedure USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Sep 7, 2022

Biden’s Asylum Processing Rule—Three Months in, What Practitioners Need to Know

The Asylum Processing Rule is a significant regulatory change under the Biden administration that allows Asylum Officers to conduct Asylum Merits Interviews of certain asylum seekers who have passed credible fear interviews rather than having those cases referred directly to the immigration court. The Rule was issued as an Interim Final Rule and took effect on May 31, 2022. This FAQ explains what practitioners need to know.

Asylum Immigration court Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Feb 14, 2022

Practice Alert: What J.O.P. Class Members Need to Know About the April 22, 2022 Deadline for Asserting Rights Under the Mendez Rojas Settlement Agreement

This practice alert describes how some members of another certified class – of certain asylum seekers with prior “unaccompanied alien child” determinations, certified in J.O.P. v. DHS , 338 F.R.D. 33 (D. Md. Dec. 21, 2020) – may also be Mendez Rojas class members. It also addresses why it might benefit some J.O.P. class members to assert rights under the Mendez Rojas agreement by the April 22 deadline, and offers thoughts on how to do so. Note that because the Mendez Rojas agreement provides rel

Asylum Children and SIJS Cross-forum Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jul 21, 2021

July 2021 Updates on Liberian Refugee Immigration Fairness (LRIF) Act

The Liberian Refugee Immigration Fairness Act (LRIF) created a limited-term program allowing many Liberians living in the United States to apply for permanent residence. Initially, LRIF’s application period opened on December 20, 2019 and was set to expire on December 20, 2020. On January 3, 2021, however, Congress passed the Consolidated Appropriations Act 2021, extending the application period for LRIF for another year, until December 20, 2021.

Asylum Cross-forum Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory May 31, 2021

Practice Alert Update: Proposed Criminal Bars to Asylum - Current Status of Regulations Governing Eligibility for Asylum and (c)(8) EAD

On July 9, 2020, NIPNLG published a Practice Alert examining the intersection of the criminal bars proposed in those regulations. In the latter half of 2020, final versions of all three proposed rules were issued, and were subsequently challenged in litigation before their effective dates. This Practice Alert provides an update on the current status of the rules as they apply to asylum seekers with criminal contacts in light of the litigation developments. As these proceedings are ongoing, this

Asylum Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Amicus brief May 12, 2021

Maria Luisa Rodriguez Tornes v. William P. Barr

“Amicus Curiae Brief in Maria Luisa Rodriguez Tornes vs. William P. Barr” NIWAP led an amicus brief with DLA Piper for a case filed in the 9th Circuit discussing how domestic violence victims are able to receive gender-based asylum because they domestic violence they experience is based on their social group membership. NIWAP’s brief documented the cultural, religious and social conditions that domestic violence victims suffer that serves as a valid basis for domestic violence related gender bas

Asylum Court of appeals Direct PDF