BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
918 resources 24 sources 848 direct files
Common starting points
Immigration court deadline 624 Asylum merits package 95 Motions, stays, and pretermission 139 Bond, detention, and habeas 85 BIA, PFR, and federal court 466 USCIS and AAO appeals 214 Crim-imm screening 158 VAWA, U, T, and survivor relief 197
Workflow: Immigration court deadline Clear

Results

Showing 325-336 of 624 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Checklist Dec 21, 2018

Representing Clients at the Master Calendar Hearing: How to Prepare for an Initial Hearing, with Quick-Reference Checklist

The master calendar hearing is the first hearing in removal proceedings before an immigration judge of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, during which serious substantive decisions can be made in an immigrant’s removal case. Advocates must be well prepared and have a clear case strategy in mind prior to the master calendar hearing, as well as a detailed plan for how to advocate during this hearing. This advisory and accompanying checklist are designed to provide a quick guide for advoc

Removal defense Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Dec 20, 2018

Representing Naturalization Clients in the Wake of USCIS's New NTA Memo

USCIS's Policy Memorandum of June 28, 2018, provides new guidance for when USCIS will issue a Notice to Appear (NTA) to applicants requesting immigration benefits. This practice advisory outlines the NTA Memo’s impact on naturalization cases. Specifically, this advisory discusses the NTA Memo’s particular directives for naturalization cases; provides the legal context for when a naturalization applicant can be placed in removal proceedings; discusses best practices for preparing a naturalization

Removal defense Naturalization USCIS Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ASISTA Practice advisory Dec 5, 2018

Annotated Notes and Practice Pointers: USCIS Teleconference on Notice to Appear (NTA) Updated Policy Guidance (December 5, 2018)

%PDF-1.5 %���� 258 0 obj <> endobj 283 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<1503034BCB2D4AA1E8EB99CB760A321F><8EC3B77A915D448F96E194F5FA3D06E6>]/Index[258 40]/Info 257 0 R/Length 117/Prev 493929/Root 259 0 R/Size 298/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``y"�d �4�L�A$��= ,� f���z�H�� &?�E��IN0� "C^�ȈL ��ab����@�� )�Q�$���3�����l;� *��Y����_ endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 297 0 obj <>stream h�b```�hV�� �  cc`a�X�eР��$�Z�R,g2D�|_2�C��i>f/�Y ��57��``��b�`�i�u���P��

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ACLU Practice advisory Oct 23, 2018

Practice Advisory: Bond Hearings for Individuals Subject to Prolonged Detention: Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden, York County Prison

Practice Advisory: Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden, York County Prison | American Civil Liberties Union Skip navigation document Practice Advisory: Guerrero-Sanchez v. Warden, York County Prison Document Date: October 23, 2018 Download document Download document Skip to PDF content

Detention / bond Federal court Removal defense Immigration court Federal district court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ASISTA Practice advisory Sep 27, 2018

2018 Notes from National Stakeholder Engagement Updated Notice to Appear (NTA) Policy Guidance (September 27, 2018)

�Eq͵�<-H� V` �W�@� ���3Y�ˋ6%� #����qn�3�#�޲��QC�Jl��KS�ӌ�:���C� BކE� �@�cpV�݃.+i#����l�0P� �� ���2���/ ��UM��(8fq�7(~4`�f3�Q@UiD���K�ٲ%�̆� �����d���ίV2��`K�M�J���k�v�6�5�e��[K���P��,7=��Y%��1���X!�sLt���Z#Bf2��F�Ͽ�q #}-٘ S��Z���L�� � )6Ѯs�wY�6��ޅ�;�������yY�^j�}�m�p��*k�n�#!�,�M1��\"-�^ �j6IS��i�5\�ȁ6�q.I�}`{�w���c�f�N3�g�P�Q ?N��t.g �@�%6�W�]��)p��M9�0PꚇN��r�� B�ǥ�c��E���rW�h��# ��!�O>G��YqO2X� ���h�J���@��A�ݵG�^�gsL^E<�G�E� ��\�_gG�I���@n

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Sep 10, 2018

Motions for a Continuance

This Practice Advisory provides a practitioner-focused overview of motions to continue a case in removal proceedings, from the basics of making a continuance motion to jurisdictional bars to appellate review of continuances. It provides an overview of continuance practice in immigration court, summarizing guidance from the Executive Office for Immigration Review discouraging the use of continuances and case law establishing scenarios where continuances are appropriate. It also sets forth strateg

Removal defense Evidence and procedure Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Aug 31, 2018

Risks of Applying for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SIJS) in Affirmative Cases

USCIS recently issued updated guidance on when it will refer a person to Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) or issue a Notice to Appear (NTA, the charging document that begins a case in immigration court). Advocates must consult this memorandum in evaluating the risk of referral in individual cases, as it now requires USCIS to issue an NTA in any case in which, “upon issuance of an unfavorable decision on an application, petition, or benefit request, the alien is not lawfully present in the

Removal defense Special immigrant Children and SIJS USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Aug 20, 2018

Bivens Basics : An Introductory Guide for Immigration Attorneys

Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971), individuals—including noncitizens or those whom the government perceives to be noncitizens—may have access to a judicial remedy for conduct by federal agents that violates the U.S. Constitution. Although litigating Bivens claims in the immigration context has become increasingly challenging in recent years, a successful claim could result in compensatory and/or punitive

Evidence and procedure Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
ASISTA Practice advisory Aug 1, 2018

Practice Advisory: Fee Waivers for VAWA Self-petitions, U and T Visa Applications (August 2018)

%PDF-1.6 %���� 125 0 obj <> endobj 137 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<9C84F6FCB73945679B427097A4533D0E><5386B4E39B8F48809C729BE973DB28D1>]/Index[125 22]/Info 124 0 R/Length 73/Prev 245315/Root 126 0 R/Size 147/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream h�bbd``b`� �@�q�+$ص��d !�$�����W a���$�2012���20 �3��0��w  endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 146 0 obj <>stream h�b```f``r� �   ���� � O@�M9�z�* �ܜżv �X?s�v10ht�O��h``Vݒ�� &���18��t������J��D'+ } �F� ��0��@����al8��" Pc`<�Hs�0Xd

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jul 18, 2018

Strategies and Considerations in the Wake of Pereira v. Sessions

In Pereira v. Sessions , the Court held that service of a defective Notice to Appear does not cut off eligibility for cancellation of removal. The rationale underlying the Court’s decision, however, more broadly affects both ongoing and closed cases initiated by defective Notices to Appear.

Removal defense Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Jul 16, 2018

UPDATED Practice Advisory: Challenging the Validity of Notices to Appear Lacking Time-and-Place Information: How to use Pereira v. Sessions to overcome the “stop-time” rule and, more broadly, to challenge Immigration Court jurisdiction (updated July 16, 2018, by IDP and NIP-NLG)

%PDF-1.7 %���� 1 0 obj <>/Metadata 486 0 R/ViewerPreferences 487 0 R>> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream x��Y[s�F~g��p E',ڻ�f�1��:mR7f�i3y�A���ɸ�����%f�d�V{��w�g׽���n�Q O��N�2M�1�� ����{��eڻL&�")�|ѻZ_�4�,�˴��apv �[! �/�B0��X@��[o�E�5�[�g b޴[ ���A �8H��P�p���_Y����0q�h3z�n� �� �/ڭs����֗ W���vI���0���T��HU�B�"�C��,���<��1�

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record