BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
918 resources 24 sources 848 direct files
Common starting points
Immigration court deadline 624 Asylum merits package 95 Motions, stays, and pretermission 139 Bond, detention, and habeas 85 BIA, PFR, and federal court 466 USCIS and AAO appeals 214 Crim-imm screening 158 VAWA, U, T, and survivor relief 197
Topic: Crimes and categorical approach Clear Workflow: Immigration court deadline Clear

Results

Showing 13-24 of 73 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jul 12, 2022

Overview of California Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants

Thousands of noncitizens in California are at risk of removal or cannot qualify for immigration relief because they have unlawfully imposed criminal convictions. The good news is that there are several options under California law to eliminate these convictions for immigration purposes, using post-conviction relief (PCR). This Advisory can help advocates to identify which of these forms of California PCR may help your client, and direct you to more resources about how to obtain it.

Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jun 27, 2022

Practice Advisory: Post-Conviction Relief Motions to Reopen

This advisory provides detailed instruction on how and where to file a motion to reopen for attorneys who have successfully vacated a conviction for immigration purposes and their client is now eligible for termination or a form of relief. In addition, the advisory addresses the impact of the post-departure bar and reinstatement of prior removal order on post-conviction relief motions to reopen.

Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Jun 24, 2022

Practice Advisory: Post-Conviction Relief Motions to Reopen

This practice advisory discusses motion to reopen strategies for noncitizens who have successfully obtained qualifying post-conviction relief. Section II distinguishes among motions to reopen, motions to remand, motions to reconsider, and motions to terminate. Section III provides an overview of motions to reopen. Section IV outlines the evidentiary requirements of motions to reopen. Section V summarizes exceptions to motions to reopen time and number limitations, including joint motions to reop

Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Mar 25, 2022

2022 Case Update: Domestic Violence Deportation Ground

The domestic violence deportation ground at INA § 237(a)(2)(E) sets out four bases for deportation: conviction of a crime of domestic violence, a crime of stalking, or a crime of child abuse, neglect, or abandonment, or being the subject of a judicial finding of violation of a domestic violence stay-away order. Coming within one of these grounds also can be a bar to cancellation of removal for non-permanent residents or DACA.

Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Children and SIJS Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
National Immigration Project Template motion Dec 21, 2021

Equal Protection Challenges to Prosecutions Under 1325 & 1326: The Groundbreaking Decision in United States v. Carillo-Lopez

Over the past two years, federal defenders have begun challenging the laws that criminalize crossing the border — 8 U.S.C. § 1325 and 8 USC § 1326 — on the grounds that the law is racist, and therefore unconstitutional. Recently, in a case called United States v. Carrillo Lopez (“ Carrillo-Lopez ”), Judge Miranda Du in the District of Nevada agreed with this argument and granted a motion to dismiss a criminal case against a person charged with the crime of crossing the border after being previou

Crimes and categorical approach Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Oct 5, 2021

How to Use the Categorical Approach Now (2021)

With a few exceptions, immigration authorities must use the “categorical approach” to determine whether a criminal conviction triggers a ground of removal. Expert use of the categorical approach may be the most important defense strategy available to immigrants charged with or convicted of crimes. This Update of our long-running article includes discussion of Pereida v. Wilkinson, 141 S.Ct. 754 (2021).

Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Jun 22, 2021

Practice Advisory: Overview of Borden v. United States for Immigration Counsel (June 22, 2021) (by IDP, NIP-NLG, and NILA)

^��ľ�{��� )VYu������5&�lV.V�# ���j�W�h��ꮭ��4#陁�큖 F\�$�$��!N�Y��� )�|(�S��j�T?��x���T*U$�Ō����w��K8�������>�q���qy]>�F�'Rb2A+�'�ᕖ��BZ*�%HJl)�@��=;w�e�F���Q��Ξ�@�uQ���rZ9� �v' [ v $H�l�ܝMin���z�Ȳ�>�k� KŒ@��}W��>47�����׬͖&:O� ��__[�7k ��$i�m~�Z����*%�h�0 3�B�[�3p������=�Ox^u����� �v�V�5U��_ujo3���g�����Q�8�]Jmo�v^k�F�Vq���� u�� v�q�n�RKk��"Y8Kk4⫙� ��^\#v��lm���)�S-� �i���Ka�K��ip6ʋ�i&��CF�� h�]��d ��V��Q�sCq��X��fk!�*�s��L�{�V�d���5�Y oHό��&�1��Hk6%C� �LM����'���U;u�pM

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Defense Project Practice advisory Jun 3, 2021

Practice Advisory: “Realistic Probability” in Immigration Categorical Approach Cases (June 3, 2021) (by IDP and NIP-NLG)

�[��m"1���e<�܊_��Ռ�;x;W��;{���� G�1M�$0�͏}1�&Uv�  PA#љeb�P���]� �fM����ct���g���9�O#9�,(�Y�'��$kp��}S�Eaw�< �-���2�Z�,�u�ꆵ�*��-�XPV�Z��§�QPg�d��:���= OX�e]�Mg��n�YW�;��c��=1`�.�3N�׵����*Q ��Lܞ�/5�'MMĖ�V � ����� ׵'\�ڂ���q(��2[gO�mYu���>�]��/�%�V�A#���Ϊ8���Ň�o�1|�u�#'L<�^���JM�Ժ�y����Zz�촤+Zu�lw�w�[=y,��2Z�Տ���t[��`+�L�6���`�-� ^�������AfBg�۵� ��P�i�{�_���\�'k�=�vU�!y*A���2�!_��AÒ;�� �(:Z��^��0v�c�}l ثe��_����'6�r�/,$zd�Z�"B���k�'hyH ��:��}�&�

Crimes and categorical approach Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
National Immigration Project Practice advisory May 31, 2021

Practice Alert Update: Proposed Criminal Bars to Asylum - Current Status of Regulations Governing Eligibility for Asylum and (c)(8) EAD

On July 9, 2020, NIPNLG published a Practice Alert examining the intersection of the criminal bars proposed in those regulations. In the latter half of 2020, final versions of all three proposed rules were issued, and were subsequently challenged in litigation before their effective dates. This Practice Alert provides an update on the current status of the rules as they apply to asylum seekers with criminal contacts in light of the litigation developments. As these proceedings are ongoing, this

Asylum Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Apr 14, 2021

Pereida v. Wilkinson and California Offenses

In Pereida v. Wilkinson, 141 S.Ct. 754 (March 4, 2021), the Supreme Court issued another opinion on the categorical approach, which is the analysis authorities use to decide whether a criminal conviction triggers removal grounds. Pereida focuses on the “modified” categorical approach, which is how courts approach a conviction under a statute that sets out multiple, separate, offenses (a “divisible” statute). Pereida overruled Marinelarena v. Barr , 930 F.3d 1039 (9th Cir. 2019) (en banc).

Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Mar 10, 2021

Overview of Pereida v. Wilkinson for Immigration and Criminal Defense Counsel

On March 4, 2021, the Supreme Court issued Pereida v. Wilkinson , No. 19-438 (2021), a 5-3 opinion damaging to noncitizens with past criminal convictions who intend or need to seek relief in removal proceedings. The decision creates a national rule concerning the impact of inconclusive criminal court plea and conviction documents for noncitizens applying for relief from removal in immigration proceedings, specifically in cases where the modified categorical approach applies. This practice alert

Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
Direct PDF Source page Record