BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Topic: Removal defense Clear

Results

Showing 169-180 of 233 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jul 14, 2016

Return to the United States After Prevailing on a Petition for Review or Motion to Reopen

This Practice Advisory contains practical and legal suggestions for individuals seeking to return to the United States after they have prevailed on a petition for review or an administrative motion to reopen or reconsider to the immigration court or Board of Immigration Appeals.

Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider BIA appeals Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jul 14, 2016

The Child Status Protection Act

This Practice Advisory provides an overview of the CSPA, its effective date, and its interpretation and implementation by USCIS, the U.S. Department of State, the Board of Immigration Appeals, and the courts.

Removal defense BIA appeals Consular practice USCIS BIA Direct PDF
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Jul 14, 2016

Voluntary Departure

This Practice Advisory addresses when the voluntary departure period runs and the events that cause automatic termination of a voluntary departure order; the serious consequences that result from failing to depart; and when these consequences do not apply. The Advisory also analyzes important changes in the caselaw and outlines arguments for when the consequences for failing to depart pursuant to a voluntary departure order should not apply. The Appendix provides background about the eligibility

Removal defense Cross-forum Direct PDF
NIWAP Library Amicus brief Nov 11, 2015

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division ruling

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia decision regarding Plaintiff’s (European Connections & Tours) challenge of IMBRA under the First and Fifth Amendments of the Constitution; specifically challenging the portions of the IMBRA statute relating to the disclosure of background information and the definition of International Marriage Brokers. Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s Complaint.

Removal defense Family-based practice Federal court Federal district court Direct PDF
ACLU Practice advisory Nov 6, 2015

Challenging Detention Without a Bond Hearing Pending Removal Proceedings

Challenging Detention Without a Bond Hearing Pending Removal Proceedings | American Civil Liberties Union Skip navigation Fact Sheet Challenging Detention Without a Bond Hearing Pending Removal Proceedings Document Date: November 6, 2015 Download document Download document Skip to PDF content Related Issues Immigrants' Rights Immigrants' Rights and Detention

Detention / bond Federal court Removal defense Immigration court Federal district court Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Jun 8, 2015

Mellouli v. Lynch: Further Support for a Strict Categorical Approach for Determining Removability Under Drug Deportation and Other Conviction-Based Removal Grounds

Practice Advisory Issue area Removal Defense Audience Attorney Published: Jun. 8, 2015 Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Copy Link to Clipboard Copy to Clipboard Download Practice Advisory

Removal defense Crimes and categorical approach Cross-forum Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Apr 17, 2015

Practice Advisory: Return to the United States After Prevailing on a Petition for Review or Motion to Reopen or Reconsider

This practice advisory contains practical and legal suggestions for individuals seeking to return to the United States after they have prevailed on a petition for review or a motion to reopen or reconsider to the immigration court or Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA).

Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider BIA appeals Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Sample brief Apr 5, 2012

Vartelas v. Holder: Implications for LPRs Who Take Brief Trips Abroad and Other Potential Favorable Impacts

This advisory describes (1) the Court’s decision in Vartelas ; (2) its potential impact on LPRs who take brief trips abroad; (3) suggested steps that lawyers (or immigrants themselves) may take immediately in pending or already concluded removal proceedings involving such individuals; and (4) some of the other potential favorable impacts of the decision.

Removal defense Immigration court BIA Direct PDF