BIA Edge

Practice resources

Practice resources

Immigration Practice Resources

Search immigration practice advisories, sample filings, manuals, brief banks, and government guidance from trusted practitioner sources.

More filters
Clear all
892 resources 24 sources 826 direct files
Workflow: BIA, PFR, and federal court Clear

Results

Showing 145-156 of 447 resources.

Sorted by Newest first
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Feb 8, 2022

Matter of Laparra

In Matter of Laparra , 28 I&N Dec. 425 (BIA 2022), the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rejected notice-based arguments for rescinding and reopening an in absentia order when the government serves the respondent with a Notice to Appear (NTA) lacking information about a hearing’s time and place as required by Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) section 239(a)(1). This practice alert provides brief background on the case law relevant to Laparra , describes the Laparra decision and its implicat

Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider BIA appeals BIA Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Feb 8, 2022

Practice Alert: Matter of Laparra

In Matter of Laparra , 28 I&N Dec. 425 (BIA 2022), the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) rejected notice-based arguments for rescinding and reopening an in absentia order when the government serves the respondent with a Notice to Appear (NTA) lacking information about a hearing’s time and place as required by Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) section 239(a)(1). This practice alert provides brief background on the case law relevant to Laparra , describes the Laparra decision and its implicat

Removal defense Motions to reopen / reconsider BIA appeals BIA Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Template motion Dec 21, 2021

Equal Protection Challenges to Prosecutions Under 1325 & 1326: The Groundbreaking Decision in United States v. Carillo-Lopez

Over the past two years, federal defenders have begun challenging the laws that criminalize crossing the border — 8 U.S.C. § 1325 and 8 USC § 1326 — on the grounds that the law is racist, and therefore unconstitutional. Recently, in a case called United States v. Carrillo Lopez (“ Carrillo-Lopez ”), Judge Miranda Du in the District of Nevada agreed with this argument and granted a motion to dismiss a criminal case against a person charged with the crime of crossing the border after being previou

Crimes and categorical approach Immigration court BIA Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice manual Nov 1, 2021

Advisory on new T Visa sections of the USCIS Policy Manual (November 2021)

%PDF-1.6 %���� 1723 0 obj <> endobj 1758 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<37C53C1572C35443B1902259615DC3DC><42114E3AEBF339469B26CB436F393914>]/Index[1723 63]/Info 1722 0 R/Length 149/Prev 287617/Root 1724 0 R/Size 1786/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``�"W�H�� �� ,� ��;�H��`�(�|���@$K����� u`�}Y"Uu�$��-��:�|^��f��H�/`6�d���Bģ���c�f�H��@���`&F6/�^�AG�g�S� ���^� endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 1785 0 obj <>stream h�b```f``����� �� Ā�B , l@����nj����E�"s!���] �š

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
American Immigration Council Practice advisory Oct 5, 2021

Immigration Lawsuits and the APA: The Basics of a District Court Action

This Practice Advisory discusses the primary issues involved in a suit brought under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) to challenge an unlawful agency action. The Advisory provides examples of how these issues have been decided in immigration cases and arguments that can be made to meet the various procedural requirements for an APA action.

Federal court Evidence and procedure Federal district court Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Sample brief Sep 23, 2021

Enforcement Priorities Litigation Update: September 2021

There have been many recent developments regarding the litigation challenges to the Department of Homeland Security enforcement priorities. This brief guide provides a quick summary to help you keep up. In short, the Enforcement Priorities are currently still in effect, although a change could come within the next few weeks. Below you will additionally find the Fifth Circuit’s temporary stay of the lower federal district court’s preliminary injunction order. While these issues are quickly moving

Federal court Federal district court Court of appeals Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jul 8, 2021

Sanchez v. Mayorkas: TPS and Adjustment after the Supreme Court’s Decision

In June 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Sanchez v. Mayorkas that addressed a circuit split regarding whether a grant of TPS was an “admission” such that it allowed an applicant for permanent residence to meet the threshold “inspected and admitted or paroled” requirement to adjust status within the United States. Previously, the Sixth, Ninth, and Eighth Circuit Courts of Appeal had held that it did, whereas the Eleventh, Fifth, and Third Circuits had held that it did not. In San

Detention / bond Adjustment of status BIA appeals BIA Court of appeals Direct PDF
ASISTA Practice advisory Jul 2, 2021

Albence Practice Advisory (Updated 6/21/2021): Stay Extended through July 2, 2021

%PDF-1.6 %���� 168 0 obj <> endobj 191 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[ ]/Index[168 45]/Info 167 0 R/Length 110/Prev 447811/Root 169 0 R/Size 213/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream h�bbd```b``� � �i5�d��;����&�@$cX�U0 ��f���Q`2DI�H [ �Xx���f�H�C ��(�� >�� � s�K�J�g` x `��X endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 212 0 obj <>stream h�b```�V�# B  �� ea���$��,�`��͒aN���O���JgX'0ɹ�o```�aҌ�b��}�� �� �>Lp˞'�q���ڧ�g?� ��̸.��~�}�5���EK���h`�``�h`��Pi���" l����Y� ,����(˂��b`pd�� ϰ�A�

VAWA / U / T Family-based practice USCIS Immigration court Direct PDF
Immigrant Legal Resource Center Practice advisory Jun 24, 2021

Overview and Cost of Common Immigration Remedies for Youth

Children and youth compose a significant portion of the U.S. immigrant population and often qualify for various forms of immigration relief, many of which involve an application filing fee. Under the Trump administration, USCIS promulgated a final rule intended to dramatically raise fees for many immigration application forms, including those available to young people, and would have limited access to fee waivers. The rule was blocked by federal courts, and after President Biden took office, the

Waivers Federal court Children and SIJS USCIS Direct PDF
National Immigration Project Practice advisory Jun 22, 2021

Borden v. United States: Supreme Court Limits Scope of “Crimes of Violence”

This practice advisory explains how Borden v. United States affects the definition of a ‘crime of violence’ for immigration law purposes. Borden effectively held that the definition of a “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a), relevant to both the aggravated felony crime of violence and crime of domestic violence deportability grounds, excludes crimes with a recklessness mens rea. Borden reverses adverse case law in the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Tenth circuits. The advisory also includes a

Crimes and categorical approach Court of appeals Direct PDF